Laserfiche WebLink
SSD, contined from page 25 <br />decade are comparatively greater as a <br />consequence of lower levels in Lake <br />Mead. It is noteworthy that observed water <br />levels at Lake Mead are lower than those <br />obtained in the SSD study, even though <br />substantially more water has been released <br />from Lake Powell in the current situation. <br />Is an SSD in Our Future? <br />There is no way to know the fate of <br />the current drought. Tarbotten (1995) <br />estimated that the SSD drought had a <br />return period of between 2,000 and 10,000 <br />years. On this basis, and assuming that the <br />climate has not changed, it is very unlikely <br />that the current drought will reach both the <br />duration and severity of the SSD drought. <br />On the other hand, we find ourselves in <br />the current drought with almost 20 maf <br />less water in the principal reservoirs <br />than at a corresponding point in the SSD <br />analysis, a situation worthy of attention. <br />The system is now susceptible to shorter <br />dry spells, which occur considerably <br />more frequently than severe droughts. <br />This susceptibility will increase rapidly if <br />withdrawals are not reduced. <br />Contact Ben Harding at blh @hydrosphere.com. The <br />entire contents of the special edition of the Water <br />Resources Bulletin on the Severe and Sustained <br />Drought Project are available at www hydrosphere. <br />com/publications/ssd/ssd. htm. <br />References <br />Piechota,T., J. Timilsena, J. G. Tootle, and H. <br />Hidalgo, 2004. The western U.S. drought: How <br />had is it ?, Eos, 85(32): 301, 304. meteora.ucsd <br />edu /cap /docs/hugo_eos_aug2004. pdf <br />Tarboton, D. G., Hydrologic scenarios for severe <br />sustained drought in the southwestern United <br />States, 1995. WaterResour. Bull., 31(5): 803- <br />814. wwwhydrosphere .com/publications/ssd/ <br />HydrologicScenariosSevereSustainedDrought. <br />pdf <br />Webb, R.H., G.J. McCabe, R. Hereford, and C. <br />Wilkowske, June 2004, rev. Aug. 2004. Climatic <br />fluctuations, drought, tout flow in the Colorado <br />River Basin, USGS Fact Sheet 2004 -3062, ver. <br />2, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological <br />Survey. warer..usgs.gov /pubs /fs/2004/3062/ <br />38 • March /April 2005 • Southwest Hydrology <br />Lower Basin, contined from page 23 <br />reduced as early as 2006. As the lowest <br />priority user in the Lower Basin, <br />Arizona's water deliveries through the <br />Central Arizona Project are likely to be <br />reduced, by an amount that remains to be <br />agreed upon. <br />No More Business as Usual <br />Although the current drought will <br />eventually subside, we cannot afford to <br />return to business as usual. Increased <br />demand has eliminated historic unused <br />supplies in the Lower Basin, resulting in <br />less water to replenish the reservoirs and <br />a reduced cushion against drought in the <br />future. From now on, cooperation and <br />prudent water use will be the hallmarks <br />of successful water management in the <br />Colorado River Basin. <br />Contact Rita Maguire at rpmaguire @thinkaz.org. <br />hydroGEOPHYSICS, Inc, <br />www. hydrogeophysics.com <br />Non - Intrusive Hydrogeologic Characterization <br />,/Alluvial Basin Definition <br />✓ Recharge Site Monitoring <br />✓ Plume Mapping <br />✓Fracture and Fissure Mapping <br />Arizona registered geophysical engineer • over 30 years experience <br />2302 N. FORBES BLVD. • TUCSON, ARIZONA 85745 <br />TELEPHONE (520) 647 -3315 • FAX (520) 647 -3428 <br />