Laserfiche WebLink
SECWCD <br />June 16, 2005 <br />8 <br />RECORD OF PROCEEDING <br />to a one -month extension to the settlement deadline, until July 29, which he had discussed with <br />the BWWP's attorney. Mr. O'Donnell moved, seconded by Mr. Reed, to approve the <br />recommended agreement to the July 29 settlement deadline. Motion passed, with Mrs. Orteg6n <br />recusing herself from discussion of this matter and the vote. <br />Mr. Leonhardt reported that Colorado Water Protective & Development Association ( CWPDA) <br />had not used some of the 2004 Holbrook and Catlin Winter Water that it had in storage in Pueblo <br />Reservoir by the decreed release deadline of May 1, 2005. CWPDA had held this Winter water <br />in storage for ultimate use as well augmentation credits. CWPDA has released the return flow <br />component of this water based on a schedule approved by the Division Engineer in CWPDA's <br />Rule 14 Replacement Plan. Thus, the only amount remaining was the consumptive use portion <br />of the water. District legal counsel told CWPDA's attorney that they would recommend <br />Southeastern consent to the late bookover of Winter water to CWPDA's "if and when" storage <br />account under the following conditions: (1) such temporary change to Southeastern's Winter <br />;Water decree is approved by the State or Division Engineer in compliance with applicable <br />statutes (e.g., as part of a Rule 14 replacement plan), with notice given to Southeastern as part of <br />the process; (2) all historic return flows are replaced at the appropriate time and location; (3) any <br />water released from the "if and when" storage is used within Southeastern's boundaries; and (4) <br />the affected ditch companies (here, both Catlin and Holbrook Canal Companies) consent to such <br />transfer. Legal counsel continues to correspond with CWPDA's attorney on this issue, but have <br />not yet heard a definitive response. <br />Lee Miller said the Board members were provided a copy of a letter to Special Master Arthur <br />Littleworth and the first monthly progress report required by his recent order in Kansas v. <br />Colorado and suggested some sections in which members might be particularly interested. <br />Lee Miller reported with regard to Colorado River issues, Jim Lochhead reported on a recent <br />conference call between The Department of Interior and the Basin States. The purpose of the <br />call was to discuss a proposed notice that Interior will publish around June 15, that initiates the <br />Secretary's process for developing shortage guidelines for Lake Mead releases, and for <br />considering other means to conserve water in low reservoir conditions (this latter is code for <br />developing triggers at Powell that will identify when the Secretary will release less than 8.23 <br />million acre - feet). The Board members were provided a copy of the draft notice. The process <br />identified in the call is that Interior expects the states to get together over the next six weeks to <br />develop consensus on shortage guidelines. Interior will propose a scoping notice to officially <br />start the NEPA process in September. Mr. Lochhead said that he does not believe the states will <br />reach consensus between now and September. Right now, there are no Basin States meetings <br />scheduled, and the states remain divided over the 8.23 million acre -feet issue. In addition to the <br />draft notice, the Board members were provided a speech presented last month by Commissioner <br />Keys that provides some insight into how Reclamation currently views many of the key <br />Colorado River issues. <br />