Laserfiche WebLink
Elizabeth Estill, Regional Forester <br />FOREST <br />TOTAL AF 11 <br />HISTORIC <br />NEW <br />Arapaho Roosevelt <br />11.52 <br />11.52 <br />0 <br />Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison <br />726.49 <br />613.369 <br />113.119 <br />Medicine Bow <br />38.28 <br />38.28 <br />0 <br />Rio Grande <br />115 <br />115 <br />0 <br />Routt <br />62.68 <br />36.294 <br />26.387 <br />San Juan <br />157.42 <br />136.42 <br />21 <br />White River <br />218.96 <br />134.27 <br />84.69 <br />IF- TOTAL <br />1,330.35 <br />The Service understands that the depletion figures presented in the biological <br />assessment are estimates of the projected forest activities over a 15 -month <br />period. These activities could change within the timeframe covered in this <br />opinion; some may not occur and others may be added. Therefore, the Forest <br />Service will require each of the seven national forests to track water <br />depletions for each forest activity. Each forest is required to submit a <br />report to the Regional Forester by August 30, 1994. The Regional Forester <br />will then provide a summary report to the Service by September 30, 1994. This <br />summary report should include the following information for each project: <br />(1) project name, (2) project location (district, township, range, and <br />section), (3) total water diverted (if applicable) in acre -feet, (4) average <br />annual depletion in acre -feet, (5) timing of depletion, (6) identify if new or <br />historic depletion, and (7) total of all depletions less than 125 acre -feet <br />annually. It is important to include information on whether each depletion is <br />new or historic occurring prior to January 1988, because the Service addresses <br />new and historic depletions differently under the new Section 7 agreement of <br />March 11, 1993. This programmatic process will need to be ongoing to address <br />f6ture water depletions from the seven national forests. <br />BASIS FOR BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br />This biological opinion addresses an average annual depletion of approximately <br />1,330.35 acre -feet from the Upper Basin. Water depletions in the Upper Basin <br />have been recognized as a major source of impact to endangered fish species. <br />Continued water withdrawal has restricted the ability of the Colorado <br />River system to produce flow conditions required by various life stages <br />of the fishes. Impoundments and diversions have reduced peak discharges <br />by 50 percent since 1942, while increasing base flows by 21 percent in some <br />reaches. These depletions, along with a number of other factors, have <br />resulted in such drastic reductions in the populations of the Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, bonytail chub, and razorback sucker that the <br />Service has listed these species as endangered and has implemented programs <br />to prevent them from becoming extinct. <br />