My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2013 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
8/13/2012 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
State
CO
Date
1/5/1995
Title
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� L � <br />1 <br />Native Aquatic Wildlife Management in Colorado <br />The Vision and Need <br />Thomas P. Nesler <br />Nongame & Endangered Aquatic Wildlife Program <br />Colorado is unique among western states because the headwaters of five major river <br />basins originate here. As such, Colorado historically provided habitat to a diverse group of <br />aquatic wildlife species that forms our wildlife heritage. While each basin shares a large number <br />of common wildlife species, each contains unique species that set each river basin apart from <br />the others. Our river basins also contain a number of wildlife species at the periphery of their <br />range, where the transition to higher elevations from our borders to the Continental Divide <br />create a changing continuum of habitat types, less suitable for some species, more suitable for <br />others. Today, these unique and peripheral species are most often observed to be in decline in <br />each of our major basins, and indicate natural attributes of our aquatic habitat and Colorado's <br />environment are being affected. As Colorado's public had expanded from its rural origins and <br />grown more urbanized, so has its perceptions and values changed. Conservation of Colorado's <br />wildlife is gaining increasing emphasis relative to the traditional focus on hunting and fishing <br />recreation. The vision of the aquatic wildlife program for the Division of Wildlife is to maintain <br />self - sustaining populations of all native aquatic wildlife in Colorado. <br />Native aquatic wildlife in Colorado is represented by 116 species of fish, amphibians, <br />mollusks and crustaceans. Eighty -four percent are nongame. Colorado's 120 fish species are <br />composed of 42% native nongame species, 5% native sport fish species, and 53% introduced <br />species. Even with over half of Colorado's fishes being introduced, only 40% of these non- <br />native fishes are valued for sportfishery purposes. The status of our native fishes shows 61 % <br />of our 56 species are considered to be at risk (Table 1). Fourteen percent no longer exist in <br />Colorado or are extinct; 13 % are threatened or endangered; and 34 % are of special concern due <br />to perceived declines or vulnerability due to low numbers and distribution. There are 3 state - <br />listed or special concern status fish species in the Rio Grande basin, 5 in the Arkansas, 6 in the <br />Republican, 9 in the Colorado, and 10 in the Platte. There are 2 -4 state - listed or special concern <br />amphibian species in each of the major river basins. One mollusk species of special concern is <br />found in the headwaters of the South Platte. The status of fifty -three percent of native <br />amphibians, 97% of mollusks, and 100% of decapod crustaceans remains undetermined. All <br />species of special concern are potential candidates for state or federal listing as threatened or <br />endangered. Those species included in federal candidate lists as category 1 or 2 are the highest <br />priority species being considered for federal listing. <br />A predominant attribute of Colorado's native aquatic fauna is that there are real or <br />apparent declines in many of these species' populations, which suggests the general quality of <br />their habitat is being degraded. To achieve the vision above, only proactive conservation of <br />wildlife at the state and local level can alter this declining trend and preclude the need for federal <br />listing and intervention. Since the majority of the state's native species are nongame, traditional <br />species by species management is impractical. As the species within each community are linked <br />01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.