My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2013 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
8/13/2012 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
State
CO
Date
1/5/1995
Title
Quantity/Quality/Wildlife Meeting January 5 1995
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Quantity /Quality /Wildlife Meeting <br />January 5, 1995 <br />Draft Agenda <br />A. Draft Native Species Concept Paper. <br />New shorter version. <br />Distribution and review process. <br />B. Discussion of plans for the March 15 Public Workshop. <br />Peter Evans, Eddie Kochman, Doug Robotham and Paul Frohardt <br />have developed the following list of possible agenda topics: <br />1. Overview: Quantity /Quality /Wildlife Interrelationship. <br />CC 2. Native Species Decline: What is the current status? <br />•fUd �1 ' 3. Current ESA /Regulatory Overlay. <br />'�� 4. Framework of a Native Species . <br />• 5. First Steps: Inventory and Assessment. <br />-- �- Re- i- a- tron- s-lrip�o -the -Smart Grew- t�— I- n- �t-- i- a -�iv� (Jhr���� -cc� <br />. WC�.Gy �S �v. Q 1 YE je.� --mot 1 ^+- �..�'f•J. -c- <br />We discussed the desirability of using the Public Workshop <br />both to provide information on topics such as these to the <br />public and also to obtain public input and feedback regarding <br />these topics. Further thought needs to be given to how the <br />latter can best be accomplished. Public comment and question <br />opportunities may be appropriate, but may limit the <br />perspectives offered to those wishing to speak at a <br />microphone. Facilitated small groups sessions on specific <br />topics may generate a broader cross - section of feedback, but <br />are time - consuming and create additional logistical <br />challenges. <br />Other details that need to be resolved include (1) the <br />location of the workshop, (2) whether there should be outside <br />facilitation, (3) how -the workshop will be funded, and (4) <br />what opportunity will be provided for informal interaction <br />among the Board and Commission members. <br />C. Discussion of options for further coordination of DNR and <br />CDPHE watershed initiative activities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.