Laserfiche WebLink
Table 5 <br />Comparison of River Administration Occurrences <br />2 Based on the 22 -year period of study as shown in Attachment E. <br />In summary, the interim contract as described in Alternatives A and B should not significantly <br />affect water supplies available for water users, nor should it significantly affect Blue Mesa <br />Reservoir operations. Language in the water agreement will be designed to protect water <br />supplies in cases of extreme drought such as occurred in 1977. Under Alternative C the <br />possibility of "calls" on the river affecting junior water users would increase. <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Existing Conditions <br />The primary fish and wildlife resources associated with this proposal are found in the Gunnison <br />River itself and with the riparian and agricultural lands along the river. Reservoirs of the <br />Aspinall Unit support cold water fisheries of kokanee salmon, rainbow trout, and brown trout. <br />Downstream from the reservoirs, portions of the river support a self - sustaining Gold Medal <br />fishery of rainbow and brown trout. In the vicinity of the Redlands Diversion Dam, the river <br />is warmer and more turbid and supports a limited sport fishery. There are 15 species of non- <br />native fish and 6 species of native fish in the river above the Redlands Diversion Dam. In terms <br />of total fish numbers, 75 percent of the fish upstream are native which is considered an <br />unusually high percentage (Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994a). Downstream from the diversion <br />dam, occasional low flow periods reduce the quality of the habitat for fish. There is movement <br />of fish from the Colorado River into this lower reach of the Gunnison River. <br />20 <br />Number of Months River <br />Percentage of Months River <br />Alternative <br />Administration Occurs ' <br />Administration Occurs ' <br />No Action <br />January - December <br />13 <br />5% <br />July - October <br />3 <br />3% <br />A and B <br />January - December <br />12 <br />5% <br />July - October <br />4 <br />5% <br />C <br />January - December <br />23 <br />9% <br />July - October <br />13 <br />15% <br />2 Based on the 22 -year period of study as shown in Attachment E. <br />In summary, the interim contract as described in Alternatives A and B should not significantly <br />affect water supplies available for water users, nor should it significantly affect Blue Mesa <br />Reservoir operations. Language in the water agreement will be designed to protect water <br />supplies in cases of extreme drought such as occurred in 1977. Under Alternative C the <br />possibility of "calls" on the river affecting junior water users would increase. <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Existing Conditions <br />The primary fish and wildlife resources associated with this proposal are found in the Gunnison <br />River itself and with the riparian and agricultural lands along the river. Reservoirs of the <br />Aspinall Unit support cold water fisheries of kokanee salmon, rainbow trout, and brown trout. <br />Downstream from the reservoirs, portions of the river support a self - sustaining Gold Medal <br />fishery of rainbow and brown trout. In the vicinity of the Redlands Diversion Dam, the river <br />is warmer and more turbid and supports a limited sport fishery. There are 15 species of non- <br />native fish and 6 species of native fish in the river above the Redlands Diversion Dam. In terms <br />of total fish numbers, 75 percent of the fish upstream are native which is considered an <br />unusually high percentage (Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994a). Downstream from the diversion <br />dam, occasional low flow periods reduce the quality of the habitat for fish. There is movement <br />of fish from the Colorado River into this lower reach of the Gunnison River. <br />20 <br />