My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Draft Environmental Assesment and Finding of No Significant Impact Gunnision River Activities February 1995
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Draft Environmental Assesment and Finding of No Significant Impact Gunnision River Activities February 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2012 3:09:46 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 3:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Draft Environmental Assesment and Finding of No Significant Impact Gunnision River Activities February 1995
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Date
2/17/1995
Title
Draft Environmental Assesment and Finding of No Significant Impact Gunnision River Activities February 1995
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Near Whitewater, average flows are approximately 2,600 cfs and extremes have ranged from <br />35,700 cfs in 1920 to 106 cfs in 1934. Under natural conditions, the river was characterized <br />by high flows in the spring and early summer due to snowmelt and lower flows in the late <br />summer and winter. Storage of water in the Aspinall Unit and other reservoirs such as Taylor <br />Park has reduced high spring flows and increased flows during other periods of the year. <br />Figure 2 on the next page shows how the monthly distribution of flows has been affected by <br />storage and other water uses. <br />Individuals and water user groups began using Gunnison River water in the 19th century with <br />establishment of numerous irrigation water rights. A water right is a real property right which <br />allows the holder to use a certain portion of the river's water for beneficial use. Most of the <br />water rights on the Gunnison River and its tributaries are direct diversion rights which allow the <br />owner to take water out of the river or stream; however, water is not always physically present <br />in a stream to meet the needs of the water rights. In ,§hostage cases,, "senior" (earlier in time) <br />water right holders can place a "call" on the river - -a request to the State Engineer to force some <br />of the water users with junior rights to cease or lower their diversions and let the water pass <br />downstream to the senior right. Significant senior diversion rights, established between 1900 <br />and 1910, include the Gunnison Tunnel of the Uncompahgre Project (1,300 cfs) and the <br />Redlands Diversion Dam (750 cfs). <br />An example of how water rights are administered might be: in a dry year, flows above the <br />Redlands Diversion Dam might fall to 600 cfs; in response, the Redlands Water and Power <br />Company could request a call on the river to try to maintain their diversion of 750 cfs. They <br />would ask the State Engineer to shut off upstream junior rights on the Gunnison River or its <br />tributaries. This can, and has in the past, affected water users along the river from Gunnison <br />and Lake Counties to Mesa County. For example, on streams upstream from Blue Mesa <br />Reservoir, junior water users were historically shut down when the Redlands Diversion Dam or <br />-Ounnison Tunnel placed calls on the river. <br />In addition to direct diversion rights, there are storage rights, which allow a water user to store <br />water in a reservoir for later release. Water stored under the State water rights system can later <br />be released when needed for a downstream use. Once stored, the water can be released and <br />protected past all other water rights such as the Gunnison Tunnel and Redlands Diversion Dam, <br />even if there is a call on the river. The largest single storage right on the Gunnison River is the <br />939,206 acre -foot decree for Blue Mesa Reservoir. A block of storage water in Blue Mesa- - <br />estimated at 148,000 acre -feet- -has been set aside to mitigate impacts of the Dallas Creek and <br />Dolores water projects on endangered fish and will be used for the interim agreement water -- <br />supply. <br />Calls on the river have decreased since the Aspinall Unit began operations in the 1960's. This <br />is because the Unit stores water in high flow periods when there are no shortages and increases <br />river flows by hydropower releases in normally low water periods as shown in Figure 2. Thus, <br />senior water right holders such as the Redlands Diversion Dam, have had more dependable <br />water supplies and junior water rights have been less likely to be "called out." <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.