My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Letter to Robert Williams April 15 1993 Comments on Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for the Razorback Sucker
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Letter to Robert Williams April 15 1993 Comments on Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for the Razorback Sucker
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2013 1:20:26 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 2:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Letter to Robert Williams April 15 1993 Comments on Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for the Razorback Sucker
State
CO
Date
4/15/1993
Author
Slazar, Ken
Title
Letter to Robert Williams April 15 1993 Comments on Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for the Razorback Sucker
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert Williams <br />April 15, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />o Existing Recovery Initiatives. The cooperative initiatives to recover the four <br />endangered fishes deserve consideration in the proposed rule for several reasons. <br />First, they are relevant in characterizing the current status and future prospect of the <br />species. Second, they include commitments by federal and state governments and <br />several Tribes to protect necessary water resources under state or tribal laws, and to <br />allow water development to proceed in accordance with applicable interstate compacts <br />and federal laws. Furthermore, these existing initiatives are in the process of <br />identifying essential elements of habitat needed to recover these fishes and providing <br />long term protection under appropriate provisions of federal, state and tribal law. <br />These factors appear relevant in the economic analysis. <br />In conclusion, the State of Colorado remains concerned that an adequate opportunity for <br />public review and comment has not been provided. The court order in Colorado Wildlife <br />Federation v. Turner and the applicable federal regulations afford the Service sufficient <br />latitude to extend the public comment period based upon the complexity of both the issues <br />and the information relevant to the proposed action. The proposed 60 day period for review <br />of the biologic and economic analyses does not seem adequate, based on currently available <br />information. Therefore, we urge that all pertinent information be made available in a <br />readily accessible format and that adequate time be allowed for public review and comment <br />prior to finalization of the rule by the Service. <br />We look forward to working cooperatively with the Service and other Recovery Program <br />participants to develop a rule that serves the needs of the endangered fish and allows <br />Colorado to protect its compact apportioned waters. Thank you again for the opportunity <br />to submit these comments. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ken Salazar <br />Executive Director <br />cc: Governor Romer <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Colorado Wildlife Commission <br />Endangered Fish Recovery Program Participants <br />gtoav9.lrr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.