My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum: May 3 1994 Recovery Program and Critical Habitat
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Memorandum: May 3 1994 Recovery Program and Critical Habitat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2013 1:36:52 PM
Creation date
8/8/2012 2:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Memorandum: May 3 1994 Recovery Program and Critical Habitat
State
CO
Date
5/3/1994
Author
Shanks, Larry
Title
Memorandum: May 3 1994 Recovery Program and Critical Habitat
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that also may impact a critical reach (e.g. water management, water quality, <br />water depletions, and nonnative fish stocking and introductions). <br />The loss of a single piece of habitat may not jeopardize the continued <br />existence of the species, but i mad! reduce the ability of CH to contribute to <br />recovery. This couldhave a detrimental effect on the reach or that portion <br />of the reach where the loss occurred and could ;preclude recovery or reduce the <br />likelihood of survival of the species. <br />Any Federal action within designated critical habitat (or outside critical <br />habitat that may impact critical habitat), regardless of magnitude of impact <br />"should be;treated as an action that "may _affect" critical habitat. Federal <br />actions which may have beneficial, discountable, or insignificant effects upon <br />the endangered fishes or their critical habitats could be deemed to be in <br />compliance with section 7(a)(2) without formal consultation with written <br />concurrence from the Service. Federal actions that "may affect" critical <br />habitat must be evaluated to determine if destruction or adverse modification <br />of critical habitat is likely to result. If the Federal action is likely to <br />result in destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, the Service <br />must discuss with the Federal agency and any applicant the availability of <br />reasonable and prudent alternatives (if.any) that can be taken to avoid <br />violating section 7(a)(2). <br />It must be emphasized that section 7 of the ESA only applies to Federal <br />actions and that each Federal action must be evaluated on a case -by -case <br />basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.