My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda: Management Committe Meeting August 18-19 1994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Agenda: Management Committe Meeting August 18-19 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2013 1:22:22 PM
Creation date
8/7/2012 3:46:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Agenda: Management Committe Meeting August 18-19 1994
State
CO
Date
8/18/1994
Title
Agenda: Management Committe Meeting August 18-19 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Peter's Notes from 8/18 -19, 1994 Management Committee meeting in Cheyenne WY <br />(organized and numbered in accordance with the draft agenda) <br />I. REVIEW/REVISE AGENDA <br />2. IMPROVING RIP OPERATING EFFECTIVENESS <br />Hamill reviewed his revised draft and letter summarizing Management Committee comments <br />and unresolved issues: <br />• Detailed vs General Descri tion of Coordinator Duties - agreed to revise draft <br />plan to reduce specificity of coordinator responsibilities, understanding that the <br />MC will review and approve specific allocation and adjustments annually in the <br />FYXX Workplan; agreed that all projects (i.e., all RIPRAP activities) must be <br />assigned to a specific coordinator; agreed John Hamill and Brent Uilenberg will <br />draft "generic" description(s) for their respective coordinators, and that one of the <br />specific responsibilities will be to develop the administrative record supporting <br />RIP actions and decisions. <br />• BuRec vs FWS Supervision of Capitol Projects Coordinator. - Agreed FWS <br />Coordinators will have lead in planning and initial (biological) design until <br />concept is clear and biological constraints are defined; then BuRec Coordinator <br />would take over lead responsibility for construction design and financing <br />coordination and communication (proposes to hire a 2d coordinator and a budget <br />analyst in FY95); agreed that Mgm't Committee will govern transfer whenever <br />there is a gray area. <br />• Number of Positions to Fund in FY95 - Already have Coordinators at FWS for <br />I &E, Flooded Bottomlands, and Propagation/Genetics; agreed ISF/Life History <br />Coordinator is greatest additional need at FWS (to develop overall strategy and <br />line -up proposals to assure progress in development of new recommendations and <br />refinement of existing recommendations, to coordinator Asp and FG studies and <br />the Coordinator Res Reoperation Study, and to pull together the life history and <br />IMO work); agreed there is a substantial job to do, that it should be addressed by <br />a coordinator within the FWS staff, and that it will advance the effectiveness of <br />the RIP; agreed that permanent funding from within the RIP base funding is the <br />appropriate means if there is $ within the FY95 budget; deferred consideration of <br />proposed Biological Assistant and Budget Analyst for inclusion in FY95 <br />Workplan (considerable concern that FWS is cutting its off - budget support for the <br />RIP and shifting the cost of administration to the RIP). <br />• Funding for Preliminary Studies Supporting Capitol Projects - covered above; <br />agreed to continue Capitol Project funding for flooded bottomlands work in FY95 <br />and adjust in FY96. <br />• <br />Program Director and FWS Coordinators Excluded from Committee Membershi <br />- agreed this restriction applies to Program Director and staff, not necessarily to <br />BuRec Coordinator(s). <br />• RIP Cost -Share Credit for Participants In -Kind Contributions - agreed to continue <br />established policy regarding treatment of Management Committee and <br />Implementation Committee member services(i.e., not to count them as part of <br />cost -share calculation), but that we need to begin tracking and accounting for all <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.