My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 3345 Fourth Amended Complaint and Related July 24 1942
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 3345 Fourth Amended Complaint and Related July 24 1942
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 2:58:08 PM
Creation date
8/2/2012 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 3345 Fourth Amended Complaint and Related July 24 1942
State
CO
Date
7/24/1942
Author
Boyle, John; Stienmeyer, E.; Rush, William
Title
Case No. 3345 Fourth Amended Complaint and Related July 24 1942
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
above mentioned, and that by reason of the premises the farming <br />and cultivation of land for a distance of about two hundred (200) <br />miles westerly from the Colorado - Kansas Line eras, and until the <br />last few years, continued to 'be confined to comparatively small <br />tracts and areas, but that nevertheless, numerous canals and ir- <br />rigation companies and corporations operating at and below the <br />City of Pueblo in said Water Districts Nos. 14, 17 and 67, pro- <br />jected large irrigation enterprises and filed upon and laid claim <br />to many large priorities of right to the use of the waters of the <br />said Arkansas River for irrigation purposes and applied for and <br />obtained in the Courts of said Water Districts Nos. 14, 17 and 67, <br />decrees awarding to their ditches and canals priorities of right <br />to large quantities of the waters of the said River, with earlier <br />dates for such priorities than the dates awarded the priorities <br />of right to the use of said waters awarded and decreed to the ditch <br />of this plaintiff company as hereinbefore stated, and to numerous <br />other priorities of right to the use of said waters awarded and <br />decreed to many other ditches in said Water Districts Nos. 11 and <br />12 for irrigation purposes. <br />12. <br />That notwithstanding the decrees awarded as aforesaid to <br />many ditches and canals in said Water Districts Nos. 14, 17 and <br />67, the claimants and users of water under the priorities therein <br />specified did not for a period of, to -wit, more than thirty (30) <br />years from and after the dates of the priorities of right given <br />by said decrees, divert from said River or put to any actual or <br />beneficial use under said priorities any more than a small fraction- <br />al part of the maximum quantity of water specified in said decrees <br />at any time during the normal stages of the flow of water in said <br />River and its tributaries, and because of that condition only a <br />comparatively small acreage and limited areas of the lands lying <br />under the ditches and canals in said Water Districts Nos. 14, 17 <br />and 67 was farmed, cultivated or irrigated, and a large portion <br />of the lands lying under said Ditches and canals in said Districts <br />Nos. 14, 17 and 67 were for many years after the rendition of said <br />decrees a part of the Public Domain and were unoccupied, unimprov- <br />ed public lands of the State of Colorado and the United States of <br />America, and the water distributing officials of Water Division <br />No. 2 of the State of Colorado were not called upon to interfere <br />and did not interfere with the use of the waters of said River <br />and its tributaries under the priorities of right awarded and decreed <br />as hereinabove stated to the Ditch of this plaintiff company and <br />other ditch and water users in Water Districts Nos. 11 and 12. <br />13. <br />That by reason of the premises the waters of said River and <br />its tributary streams were for a period of more than forty -five <br />(45) years constantly and continuously diverted and used benefi- <br />cially for the purpose of irrigation to the full extent and amount <br />of the junior priorities of right awarded and decreed to the <br />ditches in said Water Districts Nos. 11 and 12 and under the <br />priorities of right so awarded and decreed to the ditch of this <br />plaintiff company and to other ditch and water users in said last <br />named water districts, and that such constant and continued use of <br />said water for irrigation purposes upon the agricultural lands in <br />said Water Districts resulted in and caused and is still causing <br />a storage and accumulation of large quantities of water in the <br />soil of the valleys along and adjacent to said River and its Tribu- <br />tary streams in said Water Districts Nos. 11 and 12, and that as <br />such storage and accumulation of water in the soil of the said <br />valleys gradually increased the said waters began to return to said <br />River and its tributaries in the form of seepage and percolating <br />waters and that such returning waters continued to run back into <br />said River and its tributaties constantly during the summer and <br />fall months of each year, and still continues so to do, in gradual- <br />ly increasing quantities and has resulted and caused and still does <br />result and cause a substantial annual increase in the normal summer <br />and fall flow and volume of water in said River and its tributaries. <br />..!{. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.