My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondences concerning Colorado v. Kansas 1942
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Correspondences concerning Colorado v. Kansas 1942
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2013 3:34:46 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 3:15:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Correspondences concerning Colorado v. Kansas 1942
State
CO
Author
Ireland, Gail
Title
Correspondences concerning Colorado v. Kansas 1942
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IN THE SUPRME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES <br />THE STATE OF COLORADO, Complainant <br />4. <br />THE STATE OF KANSAS <br />and <br />THE FINNEY COTJM WATER USERS' ASSOCIATION, <br />A Corporations Defendants <br />Complete! List of the Pleadings <br />and Ordure of the Court <br />1. Colorado ?a motion for leave to file original bill of complaint <br />In equity and original bill of complain.+, <br />✓ 2, Defendantst motion to dismiss the Bill of Complaint in Equity <br />and the Case. <br />✓ 3. Defendants' brief on their motion to dismiss the Bill of Complaint <br />and the Case. <br />✓ I,* Supplemental brief for defendants on their motion to dismiss the <br />bill of complaint in equity and the Case. <br />5. Colorado's brief on defendants' motion to dismiss. <br />b. Reply brief of defendants on their motim to dismiss. <br />W7. Notion of defendants for additional parties* eto. <br />8. Brief for the defendants in support of their motion to require <br />certain Colorado irrigators be made defendants herein eto. <br />9. Colorado's answer to defendants' motion to require certain Colo- <br />rado irrigators be made defendants herein sto. <br />10. Defendants? motion for leave to introduce the evidenoe of A. J. <br />Abbott and James Craig taken in a prior case. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.