My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Background Operation of Grand Valley Diversions
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Background Operation of Grand Valley Diversions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2013 4:34:28 PM
Creation date
7/31/2012 2:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Background Operation of Grand Valley Diversions
State
CO
Title
Background Operation of Grand Valley Diversions
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Under the current strict river administration, the GVIC junior right for 120 cfs will call for <br />water from Green Mountain Reservoir while the OMID tailrace is allowed to drain freely <br />into the Colorado River below the GVIC diversion. <br />Impacts on the 15 -Mile Reach of the New Operation <br />The relatively large and senior irrigation and power diversions in the Grand Valley, help <br />bring water to the Reach as well as take water from the Reach. These senior rights are <br />capable of prohibiting upstream junior appropriators from diverting water and are also <br />capable of requesting releases from GMR. The significance of GMR to the Grand Valley <br />water supply should not be understated. Without these releases, upstream water supply to <br />junior appropriators would be restricted and OMID would frequently be required to <br />implement the check in order to generate power. For example, in the first 18 days of <br />September 1991, GMR released over 25,000 AF of water at an average flow rate of over <br />700 cfs. <br />The Colorado River Water Conservation District ( CRWCD) developed a computer <br />spreadsheet to assess the impact of the new check operation on upstream stored water (most <br />notably Green Mountain Reservoir). Current estimates of the impact depend on the flow <br />capacity of the bypass channel, but range from about 20,000 to 30,000 AF. This number <br />roughly corresponds to what the current operation plan for Green Mountain Reservoir says is <br />available for sale. Adding the 20,000 to 30,000 AF to the 66,000 that was released in 1977, <br />a total of 86,000 to 96,000 AF of releases from GMR would have been required if the check <br />had been operated then as it is today. The Reach benefits from the new operation of the <br />check because Grand Valley irrigators will place more demand on upstream storage to meet <br />diversion requirements while the tailrace of the Orchard Mesa pumping and powerplants <br />return all pumping and power generation flows to the Reach. <br />The aggregate of the Grand Valley irrigation and power diversions can place a demand of <br />about 2,260 cfs on the Colorado River during the irrigation season. When the river is at <br />2,260 cfs, theoretically 582 cfs will be released through the Orchard Mesa Power and <br />Pumping Plant to the Reach. Under current operations of the Orchard Mesa Irrigation <br />District check, this flow is maintained until the flow in the river falls below 2,141 cfs. For <br />every 1 cfs decrease below 2,141 cfs at the Cameo gage, the flow in the Reach decreases 1 <br />cfs. The Reach can be essentially dry immediately downstream of GVIC's diversion dam <br />when the natural flow at Cameo falls below 1,559 cfs. However, the possibility of the flows <br />in the river decreasing to these levels is remote as long as releases are available from GMR. <br />The peak flow rate required to maintain the 600 cfs flow recommendation is 565 cfs based <br />upon the monthly deliver requirements by the FWS. <br />Based upon the CRWCD computer model, the current operation of the check could deplete <br />or nearly deplete all Western Slope storage in GMR. If this happens, both water users and <br />fish habitat would suffer. Consequently, in a very low water year, it may actually be <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.