My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995 Washington, D.C. Briefing Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
1995 Washington, D.C. Briefing Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 3:04:57 PM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:28:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
1995 Washington, D.C. Briefing Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/16/1995
Title
1995 Washington, D.C. Briefing Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public attitudes about endangered Colorado River fish <br />In 1994, Colorado State University researchers completed a telephone survey of residents of west- <br />ern Colorado and eastern Utah regarding their attitudes toward endangered fish. The study found <br />that 66 percent of all respondents support efforts to recover endangered fish, as shown below. <br />Within each of the four publics surveyed, 60 percent of elected officials, 61 percent of anglers, 70 <br />percent of the general public and 82 percent of members of environmental organizations all stat- <br />ed they support efforts to recover endangered fish. <br />This same trend was found in several other questions on the survey. For example, 59 percent of <br />respondents said their attitude toward preserving endangered fish was positive. Also, only 28 per- <br />cent of respondents agreed with the statement "Endangered fish should not be recovered unless <br />there is a direct benefit to humans" <br />(Researchers conducted telephone interviews with 304 members of the "general public," 300 <br />anglers, 168 elected officials and 125 environmental group members. The confidence interval is + <br />10 percent for the general public and angler samples; ± 2 percent for elected officials. A reliable <br />estimate of the number of environmental organization members was not available, therefore a con- <br />fidence interval could not be calculated for this group.) <br />Support for efforts to recover endangered fish <br />100% <br />75% <br />50% <br />25% <br />0% <br />Support Neutral Oppose <br />Support for efforts to recover endangered fish, by group <br />(% indicating support) <br />82% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.