Laserfiche WebLink
Razorback Sucker Listing and Recovery Plan — The USFWS has developed a draft <br />recovery plan with comments due January 5, 1998. Staff needs to participate in this process to <br />make sure the plan contains measurable recovery goals and reasonable implementation schedules. <br />Furthermore, the recovery efforts need to be consistent with the current recovery goals and plans <br />for the other endangered Colorado River fishes. <br />GVIC Fish Ladder — The EA and FONSI for the project were completed in 1997. Access and <br />mitigation agreements have been secured and a new bridge is being constructed over the "Check <br />Canal." that will provided access to the diversion dam. Construction of the ladder was completed <br />in late 1997 and it is ready for use in 1998. <br />Endangered Fish Flow Protection - Among the efforts to implement the Recovery Program <br />"recovery action plan," which we helped develop, the CWCB has filed four water rights <br />applications for the "15 -Mile Reach" of the Colorado River (between Palisade and Grand <br />Junction). One would protect 581 cfs of flow in the reach during July, August and September, <br />another 300 cfs of accretions to the reach during July, August and September, a third specified <br />baseflow levels on a year -round basis, and the last all remaining flows after a carve out of <br />100,000 of has been developed. The carve out could be increased by up to an additional 300,000 <br />AF under certain conditions. <br />Grand Valley Water Management Project - Improvement of the Grand Valley <br />Government Highline Canal was identified by the Recovery Program as one of the best <br />opportunities to increase flows available for recovery of the endangered fish in the 15 -Mile Reach <br />without adverse impact to existing uses of water and without injury to water rights. This canal, <br />which was built by the Bureau of Reclamation between 1912 -17, is approximately 50 miles long <br />and delivers water to approximately 1400 water users in Mesa County (approximately 23,340 <br />irrigated acres). <br />The canal is operated as a "flow through" system because it has no regulating capacity which <br />results in administrative spills of approximately 60,000 AF of water on an average annual basis. <br />The Recovery Program has proposed to invest approximately $8.5 million to install and operate a <br />set of "check structures" at strategic points along the canal and a pump at the Highline Lake to <br />reduce or recover approximately 28,500 AF of spilled water annually. To the extent that these <br />improvements reduce the Grand Valley Project's reliance upon releases of water from the Green <br />Mountain Reservoir, larger and more frequent surplus storage conditions at Green Mountain <br />Reservoir are anticipated and we are exploring options for delivering that additional storage water <br />to enhance fish recovery flows in the 15 -Mile Reach in accordance with state and federal law and <br />existing water rights. Settlement of the Orchard Mesa Check Case was a major part of the overall <br />strategy for accomplishing this goal. The successful negotiation of a Surplus Water Agreement <br />between USBR, the Grand Valley Water Users' Association, the Orchard Mesa Irrigation District <br />and the Public Service Company of Colorado is another key part of the strategy. Negotiation of <br />this agreement is scheduled to start in January, 1998. <br />Ruedi Reservoir - The Recovery Program for the Upper Colorado River Basin is looking to a <br />portion of the Ruedi Reservoir storage as a source of water to augment fish recovery flows in the <br />15 -Mile Reach. This is because there is approximately 21,650 AF of "uncommitted" water after <br />two efforts to market the water supplies allocated to western Colorado uses. The Recovery <br />Program agreed in 1994 to explore arrangements for using the water which is uncommitted after <br />the latest marketing effort to enhance fish recovery flows for approximately 15 years, and the <br />FWS relied upon that commitment in approving the Bureau of Reclamation's proposed "Round <br />II" sales. These efforts have become complicated by reservoir operation limits intended to <br />C; \msoffice \win word \document \basinissues <br />December 30, 1997 <br />Page 6 of 19 <br />