Laserfiche WebLink
MEASURED PREFERENCE <br />GOALS <br />SUBGOALS <br />OBJECTIVES <br />CRITERIA RELATIONSHIP (1) <br />(SCORES) <br />MINIMIZE PERMITTING <br />1007. <br />MINIMIZE PERMITTING CHALLENGES <br />1007. 1. <br />ANTICIPATED PERMITTING DIFFICULTIES <br />CHALLENGES <br />��1 <br />I�J 2. <br />FISHERIES <br />l� <br />MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO BIOLOGICAL HABITAT <br />= 3. <br />WETLANDS <br />4. <br />SENSITIVE HABITAT <br />MINIMIZE BIOLOGICAL <br />E =100% <br />MINIMIZE ENVIRCNYENTAL <br />RESOURCE IMPACTS <br />IMPACTS <br />F-�-1 <br />u <br />MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO SENSITIVE SPECIES <br />100 5. <br />SENSITIVE SPECIES <br />E =100% <br />0 <br />MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO HISTORICAL RESOURCES 1007. 6. <br />HISTORICAL RESOURCES <br />F-7 <br />D MINIMIZE CULTURAL /VISUAL <br />RESOURCE IMPACTS <br />r� <br />L�J <br />MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO VISUAL RESOURCES <br />1001. 7. <br />VISUAL RESOURCES <br />E=100% <br />E=100% <br />8. <br />FEDERAL LANDS <br />D <br />MINIMIZE LAND USE IMPACTS <br />9. <br />PRIME AGRICULTURAL LANDS <br />D 10. <br />PRIVATE LANDS HOMESTEADS <br />�—I <br />MINIMIZE COMMUNITY IMPACTS <br />E =100% <br />D 11. <br />CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC <br />SECWCD/ <br />-�--1 <br />L.J <br />MINIMIZE COMMUN Itt DISRUPTIONS <br />= <br />RELOCATIONS <br />ARKANSAS <br />0 MAXIMIZE <br />E =100% <br />12. <br />ROAD <br />BASIN <br />SOCIAL BENEFITS <br />E =100% <br />PROJECT <br />MAXIMIZE RECREATIONAL <br />1008 <br />� <br />MAXIMIZE RECREATIONAL OPPCRTUNI TIES <br />013. <br />STREAM -BASED <br />OPPORTUNITIES <br />�-1 <br />D 14. <br />FLAT -WATER BASED <br />E=100% <br />E=100% <br />D <br />MAXIMIZE STORAGE POTENTIAL <br />1007 15. <br />PERCENT OF TOTAL NEED MET <br />D <br />MINIMIZE WATER QUALITY CONCERNS <br />1007. 16. <br />WATER QUALITY BELOW LAKE MEREDITH <br />D MAXIMIZE OPERATIONAL <br />loot MAXIMIZE OPERATIONAL <br />EFFECTIVENESS <br />RELIABILITY AND EFFICI ENCY <br />ENHANCE EXCHANGE POTENTIALS <br />1007 17. <br />CH <br />NUMBER OF EXANGE <br />' <br />QPPORTUNITIES PROVIDE <br />PROVIDE MUL1I- PURPOSE BENEFITS <br />1007 18. <br />NUMBER OF BENEFITING ENTITIES <br />(REGIONAL PROJECT) <br />E =100% <br />a <br />D MINIMIZE CAPITAL COST <br />1007. <br />MINIMIZE CAPITAL COST <br />X007 19. <br />TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL COSTS <br />D MINIMIZE OVERALL <br />i <br />PROJECT COSTS <br />MINIMIZE TOTAL COST <br />1007. <br />MINIMIZE TOTAL COST <br />1007 20. <br />AL COST <br />pERMACRE <br />E =100% <br />F007 <br />4 <br />E =100% <br />LEGEND <br />m O - INDICATES NODAL POINT <br />(1) PREFERENCE RELATIONSHIPS FOR <br />SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO <br />PRELIMINARY <br />v WHERE SCORES ARE <br />SCORING IN EACH CATEGORY <br />WATER CONSERVANCY <br />FUTURE WATER AND STORAGE FUNCTIONAL HIERARCHY <br />COMPUTED <br />TO BE DEVELOPED <br />DISTRICT <br />NEEDS ASSESSMENT <br />PROJECT FOR DECISION <br />= Q - INDICATES LOCATION WHERE <br />WEIGHT IS REQUIRED FOR <br />ANALYSIS <br />b MODEL COMPUTATION <br />GEI Consultants, Inc. <br />PROJECT N0. 97411 MAY 1998 1 FIGURE 1 <br />