Laserfiche WebLink
e. During flood operations offset account spills after existing JMR Section III accounts for <br />alternate place of storage held by upstream diverters: Ft. Lyon Canal Co., Amity Mutual, and <br />Las Animas Consolidated Canal Co. Spills prior to all District 67 accounts at JMR. <br />f. Evaporation is prorated on the basis of volume with all other accounts and pools in the <br />Reservoir. Initially evaporation is charged to Colorado, but after depletions have occurred <br />than Kansas pays evaporation on water they choose to leave in account. <br />g. Transit losses on deliveries to Stateline must be made up by additional account releases. <br />h. Colorado must make monthly and annual accounting to Kansas and account may be <br />discontinued by either State effective on March 31 by giving notice prior to Feb. 1 of any <br />year. <br />2. Stipulation approved by Special Master on April 4, 1997 controls method for determining <br />credits Colorado receives against post- Compact well pumping for water delivered to and released u� <br />from the offset account. <br />a. Only fully consumable water [non- native or historical consumptive use] can be used to -- <br />offset well depletions. Determination of consummability to be made by Colorado SEO, <br />subject to review and challenge by Kansas, burden on Colorado to prove. <br />b. Stateline deliveries made on Kansas's demand subject to transit losses from JMR to <br />Stateline, and Colorado only receives credit for volume actually released and reaching <br />Stateline. Over deliveries are credited against future depletions. <br />Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment. The CWCB is providing $75,000 <br />b, (approximately 45% of study cost) and technical assistance for this study sponsored and <br />coordinated by an "enterprise" created by the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />(SECWCD). The study will help municipal and agricultural water users in the district service <br />area identify future water demands, evaluate the adequacy of existing supplies and identify <br />potential cooperative solutions to meet projected needs. The CWCB is participating both to <br />encourage collaborative planning efforts and to assess the availability of augmentation water <br />supplies for continued compliance with the Arkansas River Compact. An engineering contractor <br />has been selected and the study is in progress. A study report will be available in ay 1998 One <br />significant alternative to be considered during the study is a proposed state sponsored water bank <br />to be used to faciliate compact compliance and perhaps help meet future wildlife and recreational <br />needs. <br />Multi- Objective Floodplain Management Planning Study. In response to the 1995 <br />statewide flooding, spills from John Martin Reservoir, and difficulty passing the design flow of <br />3,000 cfs down to the stateline; the CWCB is conducting "multi- objective" planning studies of <br />floodplain management issues for the Arkansas (South Platte, and Roaring Fork Rivers have <br />similar studies in progress). These studies involve stakeholder groups and are expected to address <br />stream conveyance, channel and bank erosion, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and other <br />shared uses of the stream corridors. One of the goals of these studies is to analyze the causes and <br />problems related to the 1995 flooding conditions and to formulate economical, usable and <br />practical solutions to mitigate and reduce future flood damages. The studies will also address the <br />partnering of the flood control, with irrigated agriculture, recreation, and environmental <br />communities and the integration of local, state, and federal flood mitigation programs. There are <br />two study reaches on the Arkansas, one above John Martin Reservoir and one below John Martin <br />Reservoir. <br />Ground Water Pumping Measurement Study. SB 97 -008 authorized funds (up to $100,000) <br />for a cooperative study by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the State Engineer on the <br />accuracy of methods used to measure ground water pumping in the Arkansas River Basin. This <br />study will evaluate the use of the "power conversion coefficient method" as an appropriate way to <br />C; \msoffice \win word \document \basinissues <br />December 30, 1997 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br />