My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Basin Issues February 1998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Basin Issues February 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2013 4:35:10 PM
Creation date
7/30/2012 1:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Basin Issues February 1998. Various colorado basins, issues, data, budgets and meetings.
State
CO
Date
2/1/1998
Title
Basin Issues February 1998
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
throughout the state to use them to plan and manage water supplies more efficiently and to avoid <br />or resolve conflicts with greater confidence. Colorado first experienced interstate allocation <br />conflicts concerning the Rio Grande in the 1950s, and the development of new supplies has been <br />very difficult ever since then; unfortunately, we may find out in the Kansas v. Colorado rulings <br />how expensive over - development of interstate streams can be to both the water users in the basin <br />and to taxpayers statewide. Recent questions raised in the litigation concerning the AWDI <br />proposal to develop water for export from the San Luis Valley and in the operation of Elephant <br />Butte Reservoir to provide water for uses in New Mexico and Texas also highlight the need for a <br />stakeholder- directed process to design and develop better decision support tools than are available <br />today. <br />In coordination with the Division of Water Resources, we have organized a stakeholder group, <br />developed a scope of work (including a schedule and cost estimate) and selected a contractor to <br />perform a $55,000 feasibility study that will provide the road map for development of the <br />RGDSS. The feasibility study is now complete in draft form and available for consideration. The <br />study has identified a three year development program expected to cost approximately $4.98 <br />million dollars. The RGDSS will include an extensive data collection program and adapt the <br />water right planning model, consumptive use model and administrative tools and Big River <br />Model developed during CRDSS for use in the Rio Grande Basin. In addition, a groundwater <br />model and a water budget model will be developed and incorporated into RGDSS. All data will <br />be handled using the State Engineer's Hydrobase data management system as done for CRDSS. <br />The feasibility study suggests that $2.0 million by provided for from the CWCB Construction <br />Fund for development during the first year. This request is included in the CWCB Construction <br />Fund Bill that the Legislature will consider during the 1998 legislative session. <br />Lower Rio Grande Study. The Lower Rio Grande Study is being done to provide a <br />background on the history of the Rio Grande Compact, the Rio Grande Project in New Mexico <br />and Texas, and the effects on Colorado's compact entitlement resulting from changes in use of <br />water in the downstream states: New Mexico, Texas, and subsequently in Mexico. The study is <br />focused on how changes in uses result in changes in demands on Elephant Butte and Caballo <br />Reservoirs, which are located in New Mexico. In turn, those effects are felt by Colorado when <br />they result in a reduction of content of Elephant Butte and prevention of a spill. Such a spill <br />eliminates the requirement that Colorado curtail diversions in Colorado for that Compact year, <br />thus significantly increasing the water available for use in Colorado. Colorado has seen these <br />water use changes cause sufficient change in demand and reservoir release patterns that the spill <br />that would otherwise have occurred in 1996 did not occur. <br />Rio Grande Compact and Issues. The Rio Grande Compact contains certain provisions with <br />respect to the content and spill of water from Elephant Butte Reservoir in southern New Mexico. <br />These provisions provide benefits to Colorado that must be protected. Because of changing demands <br />from seasonal irrigation deliveries to year -round deliveries to supply the municipal demands of El <br />Paso, Texas, Colorado's benefits under the Compact can be impaired. Colorado believes that a spill <br />of Elephant Butte Reservoir in 1996 was prevented by the release and waste of water below El Paso. <br />Texas has opposed Colorado's position, and the controversy remains unresolved. Colorado met with <br />Texas' water users in June to discuss the issue and work toward a resolution by the Compact <br />Commission to adjust the accounting of the content of Elephant Butte Reservoir for municipal <br />releases. <br />Endangered Fish Protection. The silvery minnow has been listed by the US Fish and Wildlife <br />Service under the ESA as an endangered species; its historic habitat is thought to be in New Mexico <br />below Cochiti Reservoir. A recovery plan is being finalized this year that could affect operations of <br />C; \msoffice \win word \document \basinissues <br />December 30, 1997 <br />Page 11 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.