Laserfiche WebLink
42 <br />111 The Holbrook Company was involved in it. <br />211 The Highland was involved in it and I think got <br />3 out.. <br />4 The Colorado Canal Company was involved in it. <br />5 In general, most of the major diver4ers downstre <br />6 were lined up as objectors clear on down to Lamar. The Lamar <br />7 Canal was one of the objectors also involved in it. So most of <br />8 the irrigators downstream appeared in the case as objectors. <br />9 The only other point I'd add in connection with <br />1011 that is that some time ago -- oh, a year, year and a half ago, <br />11 January 1977 -- the water court approved a stipulation among <br />12 all parties at that time that the Bessemer could store on a <br />13 temporary basis, without the benefit of a court decree, some <br />14 water and would bypass some other portion of the water. <br />15 This morning, following the conclusion of <br />16 evidence, the various parties moved to vacate that stipulation <br />17 or the court granted that motion this morning and the water cour <br />18 directed me to prepare a ruling for his signature; in short, <br />19 to put in written form what he told all of us from the bench <br />20 <br />this morning <br />and <br />to submit that to him within one week. It will <br />21 <br />be backdated <br />to <br />today's date. <br />22 So as of today, the so- called temporary storage <br />23 arrangement which had been agreed to by all of the ditch <br />24 1 companies has been vacated. <br />4 <br />25 Moving to what you might call the Model Reservoir <br />