Laserfiche WebLink
22 <br />1 <br />would. <br />2 <br />MR. COOLEY: What is your guess of the design <br />3 <br />capacity on the upper end of the gages ?: <br />4 <br />MR. JESSE: We have no rating tables or anything. <br />5 <br />yet. <br />6 <br />The flow in Muddy Creek during the 165 event <br />7 <br />was probably considerable and I don't know what -- I don't know <br />8 <br />if the bridge went out or not in 165. Maybe somebody can help <br />9 <br />me there. <br />10 <br />MR, COOLEY: We saw stumps on hilltops, I recall, <br />11 <br />from '65. It would be some gages that would do it. <br />12 <br />Yes, Mr. Schroeder. <br />13 <br />MR. SCHROEDER: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Jesse has been <br />14 <br />talking about what might reach John Martin under present <br />15 <br />conditions and I think it might be helpful for the Commission <br />16 <br />to know what might reach John Martin assuming that.the transfer <br />17 <br />application presently before the court and pending before the <br />18 <br />court is approved as written. That would probably give the <br />19 <br />Commission some information that might possibly be of more <br />20 <br />benefit than the information which he gives now based upon a <br />21 <br />fraction of the storage right. In short, there's a substantial <br />22 <br />fraction of the storage right remaining in Muddy Creek and that <br />23 <br />fraction is presently involved in a transfer proceeding to <br />24 <br />bring it to John Martin. <br />25 <br />Now, if the decree is granted as requested, <br />