My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 3:42:50 PM
Creation date
7/27/2012 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
5/11/1978
Author
Newton, Patricia
Title
Arkansas River Compact Administration and U.S. Geological Survey Sate of Colorado Meeting May 11 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
19 <br />1 Now, Bob, was this 5,000 feet, is this 51000 <br />2 feet all the Muddy Creek water rights that are significant to <br />3 storage in John Martin? <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />MR. JESSE: They are the only ones in which..a <br />decree has been handed down. There.is a proceeding now before <br />the water court concerning the remainder of the water right, <br />but that has not been decreed yet._ <br />MR. COOLEY: And about my last question, with <br />this refreshment of my recollection, it seemed to me when we <br />were out there you took us through it so thoroughly before that <br />the only way in which.John Martin would enjoy the benefits of <br />the Muddy Creek decree was for there to be an unusual precipita- <br />tion event in the Muddy Creek area or in one of the tributaries <br />in Muddy Creek; is that right? <br />MR. JESSE: Yes. The decree spells out the <br />steps that it goes through that would become necessary before <br />there could be water stored in John Martin, but there would <br />have to be precipitation above the old Muddy Creek Reservoir <br />before there could be. <br />MR. COOLEY: Have I.asked him the questions <br />necessary to a fundamental understanding of the Muddy Creek <br />thing? <br />MR. MELTON: I believe so. <br />MR. COOLEY: Okay, fine. <br />Now,_ Bob, please go ahead, and I know you will <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.