Laserfiche WebLink
tively small area. These general observations closely fit the storm <br />characteristics of the Bear Creek watershed. Distinrui:shin;;:; feaaurc;s of salle of <br />the past storms in this region, insofar as they are known, are compared in <br />the following table: <br />36. Available hydrological data.- No U. S. Weather Bureau precipi- <br />tation stations have been maintained in the basin. The nearest station <br />with a detailed record of precipitation intensities is at Denver (approxi- <br />mate elevation 5,200 feet.) It is believed that the data contained in <br />the table, paragraph 35, are more indicative of the rainfall rates which <br />can be expected in the cloudburst zone of Bear Creek Basin than the Denver <br />record. <br />37. Stream gaging was begun on Bear Creek in 1837. However, the <br />characteristics of this stream necessitate a continuous gage record for <br />an adequate study of flood flows. Such records are available at I:iorrison <br />since 1924 and at Sheridan Junction since 1928, with the exception of <br />several critical flood periods. Available peak rates of flow for out- <br />standing floods have been estimated by the slope -area method. <br />B. BASIS OF DESIGmT FOR FLOOD CONTROL <br />38. General considerations. - It is desired to use, as a basis for <br />-• 12 - <br />Precip' cation <br />:IvTaximum: <br />Area of Duration <br />Location <br />Date <br />:inches :intense rain: <br />hours <br />sq. mi. <br />Near <br />Idalia, Colo. :�.Iay 30 -31, 1935 <br />: 18 <br />3,000 <br />3 <br />Near <br />Kiowa, Colo. <br />do <br />24 <br />2,000 <br />3 <br />Near <br />Pueblo, Colo. :June <br />3 -4, 1921 <br />: 14 <br />300 <br />2 - 15 <br />1Tear <br />lorrison,Colo.:Sept. <br />2, 1938 <br />: 10 <br />60 <br />2 - 4 <br />Near <br />La Junta,Colo.:Sept. <br />15, 1934 <br />5 <br />635 <br />2 <br />Near <br />Holly, Colo. :Aug. <br />28, 1935 <br />: 11.5 <br />100 <br />2 - 4 <br />Granada Creek Basin,:July <br />11 -12, 1935 <br />: 9 <br />115 <br />8 <br />eastern Colorado . <br />36. Available hydrological data.- No U. S. Weather Bureau precipi- <br />tation stations have been maintained in the basin. The nearest station <br />with a detailed record of precipitation intensities is at Denver (approxi- <br />mate elevation 5,200 feet.) It is believed that the data contained in <br />the table, paragraph 35, are more indicative of the rainfall rates which <br />can be expected in the cloudburst zone of Bear Creek Basin than the Denver <br />record. <br />37. Stream gaging was begun on Bear Creek in 1837. However, the <br />characteristics of this stream necessitate a continuous gage record for <br />an adequate study of flood flows. Such records are available at I:iorrison <br />since 1924 and at Sheridan Junction since 1928, with the exception of <br />several critical flood periods. Available peak rates of flow for out- <br />standing floods have been estimated by the slope -area method. <br />B. BASIS OF DESIGmT FOR FLOOD CONTROL <br />38. General considerations. - It is desired to use, as a basis for <br />-• 12 - <br />