My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Instream Flows for Recreation: A Handbook on Concepts and Research Methods
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Instream Flows for Recreation: A Handbook on Concepts and Research Methods
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2017 12:41:36 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 2:13:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Instream Flows for Recreation: A Handbook on Concepts and Research Methods
Date
1/1/1993
Author
Whittaker, Doug; Shelby, Bo; Jackson, William; Beschta, Robert - National Park Service
Title
Instream Flows for Recreation: A Handbook on Concepts and Research Methods
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Exploring the Flow - Environment Relationship In Grand Canyon <br />The Colorado River in Grand Canyon provides a third example of how an altered flow regime can have <br />significant impacts on the river environment. Glen Canyon Dam, just upstream of the Canyon, was authorized on <br />the basis of its ability to control floods, deliver water for irrigation, and generate hydroelectric power (particularly <br />peaking power). In meeting these goals, however, dam operations apparently affected several natural and <br />recreation resources downstream. In recent years, environmental advocates have become increasingly concerned <br />about those effects and federal agencies are in the process of completing a series of comprehensive studies to <br />quantify what is happening as a result of current dam operation, as well as what is likely to happen in the future <br />under different operating regimes. Costing several million dollars, the size of the effort helps suggest the complex <br />and controversial nature of the issues. There may not be any single or simple flow regime that will provide for all <br />desired outputs. Some of the more interesting natural resource questions being explored in the studies include: <br />❑ Are daily flow fluctuations (to produce peaking hydropower) contributing to beach erosion? Has the loss of <br />spring floods created a situation where beaches are no longer rejuvenated? Can periodic high flow releases be <br />designed to optimize beach rejuvenation? <br />C <br />❑ How have the less turbid waters <br />from the dam affected aquatic <br />species? Is the introduced trout <br />fishery (which survives because of <br />the colder temperatures) <br />outcompeting native fish species <br />such as humpback chub? Are the <br />fluctuating flows from the dam <br />stranding fish? <br />❑ Have the newly established fisheries <br />had effects on other wildlife in the <br />Grand Canyon? For example, bald <br />eagles may benefit from the new <br />trout fishery. <br />❑ Has the loss of spring floods and <br />associated deposition allowed <br />tributaries to expose and erode <br />significant archeological sites? <br />changes from Glen Canyon Dam have had a number of implications for the <br />river environment. <br />Grand Canyon studies have also explored flow needs for rafting safety and challenge, and a comprehensive <br />Environmental Impact Statement on how to operate the dam will include a variety of alternatives that integrate <br />different flow needs for different resources. However, the effort is particularly noteworthy because of the extensive <br />work on how flow changes have affected the long -term environment which is also critical for high quality recreation. <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.