Laserfiche WebLink
There are a variety of methods involved in <br />executing this step, and subsequent chapters <br />explore those methods in greater detail. <br />Chapters 4 and 5 discuss the range of methods <br />being used in flow studies, many of which offer <br />techniques for evaluating conditions or flows. <br />Sections of Chapter 7, on developing flow need <br />recommendations, also address the integration <br />tasks inherent in this step. <br />Step 7: <br />INTEGRATE FLOW NEEDS <br />FOR VARIOUS OPPORTUNITIES <br />At this point in the process, flow needs for <br />individual opportunities or resource qualities <br />have been clearly defined. The next step is to <br />integrate those needs with each other. This is <br />another evaluative step which may require <br />balancing different and often competing flow <br />needs for various opportunities. For example, <br />one flow regime may provide excellent trout <br />fishing and scenic boating, but would fail to <br />provide a high quality whitewater opportunity. <br />The goal here is to develop a flow regime (or <br />range of alternative flow regimes) that considers <br />the trade -offs of providing different <br />opportunities. <br />The best integrations will provide for many <br />opportunities, but in some cases the "elegant <br />solution" may be more difficult to find. On a <br />regulated river, the goal is to find a balance <br />among opportunities in light of the river's <br />traditional uses, policy mandates, and potential <br />to provide the highest value opportunities or <br />resource outputs. On an unregulated river, the <br />goal is to protect existing high value <br />opportunities or resource outputs. In either <br />case, decisions may come down to interest group <br />politics and the vagaries of resource planning. <br />However, a good study will help improve that <br />planning process by providing a structure to <br />focus discussion and debate. In this step, you <br />build that structure through an explicit <br />discussion of trade -offs and flow regime <br />alternatives. <br />Chapter 7 of the handbook explores some of <br />the techniques that can be used to complete this <br />step, including a discussion on the development <br />of "flow scenarios" or flow regime alternatives. <br />That chapter also discusses integrating flow <br />15 <br />needs for various recreation opportunities with <br />the flow needs for other resource outputs such <br />as fish or wildlife habitat, hydropower <br />generation, or withdrawals for industrial <br />activities, municipal water supply, or <br />agriculture. <br />Step 8: <br />DEVELOP STRATEGIES <br />TO PROTECT /OBTAIN FLOWS <br />The final step in the process is to develop a <br />strategy to obtain or protect instream flows. <br />This step requires evaluating and blending legal, <br />administrative, and technical alternatives to <br />maintain or enhance flow - dependent values. <br />The strategy needs to be realistic, <br />administratively efficient, and as flexible as <br />possible in recognizing the many overlapping <br />and competing interests for instream flows. I1 <br />is out of the scope of this document to discuss <br />the full range of legal options for protecting or <br />obtaining instream flows. In general, the <br />primary focus will be on establishing an <br />instream flow water right under applicable state <br />law. However, alternative water rights <br />strategies should be evaluated, including the <br />reserved rights doctrine and opportunities for <br />acquiring or transferring existing rights. <br />The keys to protecting a water right are <br />specifying an amount that protects resource <br />values, quantifying the right so that it can be <br />realistically measured and protected, establishing <br />a meaningful priority date in relation to <br />competing water uses, and developing an <br />effective administration strategy. <br />An instream flow assessment might consider <br />other (nonlegal) administrative and technical <br />options to support the purposes of an instream <br />flow water right. For example, water control <br />structures and watershed management <br />techniques may be used to regulate runoff and <br />streamflow to meet instream objectives. <br />Rights -of -way permitting and land purchase and <br />exchange may also be used to curtail <br />consumptive uses of water that conflict with <br />instream flow objectives. Land management, <br />such as proper floodplain development, control <br />of access, or management of riparian vegetation, <br />may enhance values or processes for which <br />instream flows are required. Finally, agreements <br />