My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Study Plan - Biological Resource Responses to Fall Steady Experimental Flows Feruary 2010
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Study Plan - Biological Resource Responses to Fall Steady Experimental Flows Feruary 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:16:53 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 2:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Study Plan - Biological Resource Responses to Fall Steady Experimental Flows released for Glen Canyon Dam 2009-12
State
CO
Date
2/1/2010
Title
Study Plan - Biological Resource Responses to Fall Steady Experimental Flows
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Data Synthesis and Integration <br />We will use several lines of evidence to determine whether humpback chub benefit from stable flows in <br />September and October because of the significance and importance of this issue. Over the next 5 years, <br />there will be hourly variation in flow rates (related to diel variations in energy demand) during summer <br />months (modified low fluctuating flows, MLFF, June through August) and lower, steady experimental <br />flows during the fall (FSEF, September and October). <br />The centerpiece of this data synthesis and integration is the nearshore ecology project (Project 1), which <br />seeks to determine the use and relative importance of nearshore habitat to humpback chub and other <br />fishes and addresses strategic science questions (SSQs) 1. 1, 1.7, 4.2, 5.4, and 5.6. This project will <br />quantify abundance, survival, habitat use, growth, and natal source of selected native and nonnative <br />juvenile fish over two flow periods (summer MLFF and FSEF). This project will evaluate humpback <br />chub response by measuring differences in static measurements (catch rate, abundance, and occupancy <br />data) and process -level measurements (proxies for fish growth — otolith daily increments, RNA /DNA <br />ratios) during fluctuating flows of July and August relative to these same measurements during stable <br />discharge in September and October. These measurements will evaluate the short-term effect of <br />interactions between flow, fish habitat selection, and growth, and will help inform analysis of humpback <br />chub recruitment trends. Because of the importance of the nearshore ecology project, a complete project <br />description is presented in appendix A. <br />If stock- assessment analysis (Project 2) finds that humpback chub recruitment trends from cohorts <br />spawned during 2008 through 2012 are strongly positive, this may provide support that steady flows in <br />September and October benefit humpback chub. During the remaining years of the experiment there are <br />likely to be differences in annual volumes, tributary activity, and other factors that will affect humpback <br />chub recruitment success and may confound data interpretation. As such, we propose that the same <br />stable discharge occur the remaining years of the experiment to minimize the number of confounding <br />factors that will complicate interpretation of these recruitment data. We are not evaluating interactions <br />between native and nonnative fish (that is, competition and predation) because previous studies have <br />evaluated these interactions (Yard and others, in press; Kennedy and others, U.S. Geological Survey, <br />unpub. data, 2010), and we do not expect there to be a strong interaction between the proposed July – <br />October flows and competition or predation. Yard and others (in press) found turbidity had a strong <br />influence on the degree of piscivory by rainbow trout, and tributary activity will have a far greater <br />impact on turbidity than steady flows. Further, the nearshore ecology project pilot study attempted to <br />quantify differences in predation risk among habitat types and across flows in August and September <br />2008, but the results Were inconclusive and the work was extremely time consuming. Thus, our <br />humpback chub projects focus on studying the short -term interactions between flows, habitat use, and <br />fish growth, and the long -term effect of these interactions on recruitment. <br />Food base data (Project 3) will provide additional insights into mechanisms underlying any native fish <br />response and seeks to determine whether and to what degree flow regimes impact the rates of primary <br />production and /or invertebrate drift. Project 3 specifically relates to SSQ 3.5. The food base project <br />focuses on process -level measurements at locations that are easy to access (Lees Ferry and Diamond <br />Creek). Frequent measurement of these parameters, which is only possible at easy to access locations, <br />will greatly increase the strength of our inferences with respect to flow. Work in Lees Ferry will be <br />especially informative because tributary sediment and carbon inputs, which have a far greater impact on <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.