My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Status and Trends of Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Update 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Status and Trends of Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Update 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2013 11:06:33 AM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Status and Trends of Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Update 2009 USGS
State
CO
Author
Hamill, John
Title
Status and Trends of Resources Below Glen Canyon Dam Update 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Update of key dommolro m natural, cultural, and recreational resew= affected by Glen Carryon Dam, surunarizicg data publisliedd raogh April 2111K <br />[The goals presented were established by the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP; httpJtwww.usbr govtu AmVamplstrategic -plan html). Predictions are <br />drawn from the 1995 Operation of Glen Canyon Final Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS) on how key resources would respond to the selected flow alternative] <br />Resource and GCDAMP Goal <br />0i' Summary <br />Natural resources <br />Water quality (water temperature) <br />No effect <br />Since 2003, downstream water temperatures have increased <br />(Goal: Establish water temperature, <br />in response to drought conditions (see http: //pubs.usgs.gov / <br />quality, and flow dynamics to achieve <br />ds/2007/251/). <br />GCDAMP ecosystem goals) <br />Specific conductance (salinity) <br />No effect <br />Drought conditions, prevalent since 1999, generally result in increases <br />in specific conductance (see http://pubs usgs gov /ds/3W. <br />Sediment (sandbars and related physical <br />Modest improvement <br />Sandbars erode during periods between high flows. Increases in <br />habitats) (Goal: Maintain or attain <br />total sandbar area and volume are only possible when high -flow <br />levels of sediment storage within the <br />releases follow large tributary floods that enrich sand supplies <br />main channel and along shorelines) <br />in the main channel (see http : // pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3020/). <br />Aquatic food web (Goal: Protect or <br />Potential major increase <br />Increases were apparent in Glen Canyon Dam tailwater reach, but the <br />improve the aquatic food base) <br />trend is unclear along downstream reaches. Unlikely that quagga <br />mussels (Dmissena bugensis) will become well established in the <br />mamstem Colorado River below Lees Ferry or its trr'butanes (see <br />httpJ)pubs usgs.gov/og2007/lW- <br />Native fish (humpback chub) (Goal: <br />Potential minor increase <br />The population of adult humpback chub (Gila cypha) decreased <br />Maintain or attain viable populations <br />between 1989 and 2001; however, adult abundance has <br />of existing native fish) <br />increased more than 50% since 2001 (see http: / /pubs.usgs.gov/ <br />of/2009/1075/). <br />Trout (Goal: Maintain a naturally <br />Increased growth potential, <br />Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) numbers have decreased in <br />reproducing population of rainbow <br />dependent on stocking <br />the Lees Ferry reach. <br />trout above the Paria River) <br />Riparian vegetation (Goal: Protect <br />Modest increase <br />Native and nonnative woody vegetation continues to expand in <br />or improve the biotic riparian and <br />the river corridor. Nonnative tamarisk (Tamanx ramosissima) is <br />spring communities) <br />the dominant species, making up 24% of vegetation (see http: // <br />pubs.usgs.gov/oV2008/12161). <br />Kanab ambersnail (Goal: Maintain or Some incidental take Snail habitat increased since 1998 (see chapter 6 at http: / /www. <br />attain viable populations of Kanab gcmrc.gov /products/score12005n. <br />ambersnail) <br />Cultural resources <br />Archeological sites affected (Goal: <br />Preserve, protect, manage, and treat <br />cultural resources) <br />Traditional cultural resources <br />affected (Goal: Preserve, protect, <br />manage, and treat cultural resources) <br />Recreation resources <br />Moderate degradation Archeological site condition continues to decline because of <br />(less than 157 sites affected) a combination of factors including erosion, gravity, visitor <br />impacts, and insufficient sediment (see chapter 11 at http:// <br />www. gcmrc.gov /productstscoret2005/). <br />Increased protection. Tribes have developed protocols for monitoring the condition of <br />cultural resources in accordance with tribal values. <br />Whitewater boating camping beaches Minor increase <br />(average area at normal peak stage) <br />(Goal: Maintain or improve the <br />quality of recreational experiences) <br />Areas suitable for camping have decreased on average 15% per <br />year between 1998 and 2003 (see chapter 12 at htipJ /www.gcmrc. <br />gov /products /score/2005/). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.