My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Upper Colorado River Commission Meetings 2005 Itinery
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Upper Colorado River Commission Meetings 2005 Itinery
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 11:35:42 AM
Creation date
7/23/2012 2:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Upper Colorado River Commission Meetings June 28, 29 2005 Itinery
State
CO
Date
6/28/2005
Title
Upper Colorado River Commission Meetings 2005 Itinery
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Basin, the depletion of the flow at Lee Ferry is less than the depletion of the flow at the place of use <br />because a portion of the streamflow used would have been lost to evaporation or evapotranspiration had <br />the water remained in the stream channels. The savings in river channel loss above Lee Ferry resulting <br />from putting the water to use in the Upper Basin constitutes salvage by use. In particular, uses of water <br />in intermittent tributary drainages, such as in the Chaco River drainage in New Mexico, do not result in <br />an equivalent reduction in flow of the San Juan River. Further, uses of ground water from non - tributary <br />aquifers, and uses of tributary ground water at locations that are far removed from perennial streams in <br />the San Juan River Basin, do not deplete stream flow of the San Juan River by the amount of use. The <br />Upper Colorado River Commission has not made determinations of salvage by use, and has not made <br />determinations as to methodologies for accounting certain consumptive uses such as irrigation <br />depletions or ground water uses. No such determinations have been considered because the Upper Basin <br />States have not approached full development of the Upper Basin apportionment. Nevertheless, the <br />effects of salvaged channel losses on man -made depletions of the flow at Lee Ferry by Upper Basin <br />States were presented in the November 29, 1948, Final Report of the Engineering Advisory Committee <br />to the Upper Colorado River Compact Commission, and Tipton and Kalmbach in 1965 prepared a report <br />for the Upper Colorado River Commission on water supplies available for use by the Upper Division <br />States that included the Department of the Interior's July 1965 projections of depletions at Lee Ferry that <br />were reduced for salvage estimated to be 4 percent of at -site depletions by projects in the Upper Basin. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation in the preparation of long -range operating criteria for the Colorado <br />River <br />pursuant to Section 602 of Public Law 90 -537 in July 1969 also considered salvage by use estimated to <br />be about 4 percent of at -site depletions in its projections of depletions of the flow at Lee Ferry by uses in <br />the Upper Basin. Only depletion of the flow at Lee Ferry is chargeable against a state's apportionment <br />of the yield available to the Upper Basin under Article III of the Colorado River Compact. <br />E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.