My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Supreme Court: October Term 1955 State of Arizona v. State of California Reporter's Transcript/Trial Proceedings
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Supreme Court: October Term 1955 State of Arizona v. State of California Reporter's Transcript/Trial Proceedings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:47:47 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 2:07:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Supreme Court: October Term 1955 State of Arizona v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropoltan Water District of Southern California, City of San Deigo, And Couty of San Diego Reporter's Transcript/Trial Proceedings
State
AZ
Date
7/14/1956
Title
Supreme Court: October Term 1955 State of Arizona v. State of California Reporter's Transcript/Trial Proceedings
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a joinder of all states. We took the opposite position oa <br />0 <br />the gTouad that the Mexican Treaty questionz were, ia effe&,� <br />so far in the future that they didn't need deteTmination. <br />If that had not been zoo it would have been true that tea <br />per Basin States had to be joined. Hey oe, we regvK the <br />decisiaa of the Court as conoluding tbB matter and re will <br />not offer evidance. We may offer records of proc eee,Li gsI, <br />but not the Jeerms. <br />in shortm we oontead that we have made at least this <br />much pTogress; that we A have established az the law of tho <br />case those things which do have to be establisbad necessarily <br />as a consequence of wbat has hzppened so far. Now, tavina <br />at least reforred to the earlier pvoeeedingp, 1 do waat to <br />reAr to a detailed orientatioa. <br />1 would like to show first what we claim to be our <br />rights, and secondly the evidance by wbich we meaa to <br />establish them, in the first place, 1 Kink it would be <br />useful at this point if we gut in your hanAs certaia doeu- <br />mants wbich we intead to use� initially we will 191Y Wn- <br />three volumes. <br />in the first pl ace j there Is this volume which is <br />called the Blue Book, which WO will refer Q as such- <br />That is a publication Q the Department of the lnteaiOrz <br />the Hoover Beni X-la tcar Cmd POWer 00ntracts- it is On tlkhho <br />list of stipulated documente- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.