Laserfiche WebLink
19 <br />in ,oart because we were not *parties at ltaat time, to the <br />eom,pao1-a and in part because, so far as the Project Act <br />was eons axnedj as I will -develop more fully in a <br />V <br />,"Aliforz.Aa c owed ed tine point ;�In issue and "there fore, tltiare <br />was nothiag to deoide. I will emTllazuiz hit POf-U-it in <br />THE <br />MASTIMR: <br />We w.-`11 <br />be very Clad to have you e-ate borate <br />on ti-lat. <br />I read <br />it befor-a <br />the pre- t:mlal con fere-race <br />-V U- Go pri ve ver -r -i r <br />i, LR. R-k do wan"' 0 <br />to that because dlreatI7 affects the pr-ob.ens 'here, <br />Now the third case in tr-,e 3eriles is the Ar'izo,--ia�-C-a*.Iiforni-a-- <br />case of lq.6. That was the suit in the natura of an appor- <br />tionment. That was diermLssed be .-Muse Vshe United � tates i.-Yas <br />not a party., a dilfficulty which hwas been obvia-tiod in th:*Ls <br />Case * <br />There followed -aurfoer folar� and what we hople 4 , przaY <br />J 0! ha <br />is not an egad es s c hai Vb1 3 au I t thwe pre 3 el�t 1C S <br />1,ia s no t, b-'t- o u <br />ii, j1 ded the pitfa" s of its jr-TedecesSOVB - <br />i ace <br />advance Of r- flux We do riot now clai-M <br />in n ixqterfere� <br />that Article 111(b) waters are technically equated to the <br />Gila as a matter of laiy,, as Justice Bxmndais held could <br />adeis <br />not be dor-e,,, but to f011014 the loader as justice Bra, <br />says. it Is -not a mal., of fact. <br />Filially, we have obviously avoided the pitfalls Of <br />c <br />otvAng tb- UWZ-Ited Sta"Ces. <br />the th-x-ee cases by J. <br />