Laserfiche WebLink
Modeling Results for <br />Colorado River Basin States' Modeling of <br />Colorado River and Reservoir Management Strategies <br />4.2.2 Probability of Being below a Key Elevation <br />50% <br />45% <br />40% <br />e 35% <br />m <br />v <br />c 30% <br />L <br />0 25% <br />w <br />0 <br />20% <br />A <br />a <br />0 <br />a 15% <br />10% <br />5% <br />0% <br />2005 <br />Figure 4 -7 <br />Probability of Lake Mead Elevation Below 1050 <br />-9- Normal - Step Short Original <br />--A-Step Short Original <br />--Step Short revt <br />- e-Step Short rev2 <br />--)E -Step Short rev3 <br />2010 2015 2020 2025 <br />Calendar Year <br />Figure 4 -7 shows the probability that Mead drops below 1050 ft is decreased <br />under the strategies that start shortages at 1100 ft compared to the Step Shortage <br />Original. A less significant difference in the probability is observed between Step <br />Shortage rev 1, rev2 and rev3. <br />4.2.3 Summary of Findings <br />Based on the Step Shortage revisions that were tested, a key finding is that Mead <br />is more sensitive to the elevation at which a shortage starts rather than the pattern <br />of shortage. <br />4.3 Extending the Interim Surplus Guidelines (ISG) <br />In addition to the sensitivity analyses for the Hybrid and Step Shortage strategies, <br />two other sensitivity analyses were performed that revealed significant findings. <br />The first analysis involved extending the Interim Surplus Guidelines from 2016 <br />through 2025, with all other parameters remaining unchanged. <br />Powell was operated according to the Hybrid Original strategy. Mead's shortage <br />strategy was Step Shortage Original. <br />24 <br />