Laserfiche WebLink
Modeling Results for <br />Colorado River Basin States' Modeling of <br />Colorado River and Reservoir Management Strategies <br />4.0 Sensitivity Analysis of Step <br />Shortage & Hybrid Alternatives <br />4.1 Hybrid <br />As discussed in Section 2, revisions were made to the Hybrid concept resulting in <br />a total of four Hybrid strategies. The goal of these revisions was to test the <br />sensitivity of two key parameters: the elevation at Mead at which Powell begins <br />to make balancing releases (Mead balancing elevation) and the elevation range <br />over which Powell would release a minimum of 7.48 MAF (7.48 band). All other <br />parameters were kept constant. For all Hybrid revisions the shortage strategy was <br />Step Shortage Original. <br />4.1.1 Powell & Mead 10th Elevation Percentiles <br />3,660 <br />3,640 <br />_ 3,620 <br />0 <br />3,600 <br />W <br />3,580 <br />3,560 <br />3,540 <br />3,520 <br />2005 <br />Figure 4 -1 <br />Lake Powell 10 "' Percentile Elevations <br />—0—Normal <br />—6— Hybrid <br />—* Hybrid rev1 <br />* Hybrid rev2 <br />-+F Hybrid rev3 <br />2010 2015 2020 2025 <br />Calendar Year <br />Figure 4 -1 shows that both Hybrid rev2 and Hybrid rev3 are consistently above <br />the Hybrid Original 10th percentile with the exception of one year. The reason for <br />this is that both of these revisions contain an elevation range of 50 ft under which <br />Powell releases 7.48 MAF, a 25 ft increase compared to the Hybrid original. Even <br />with the increased Mead balancing elevation, Hybrid rev3 is still higher than <br />Hybrid Original due to the increased 7.48 band. <br />18 <br />