My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Summary Report (Working Draft) Modeling of Reservoir Management Strategies for Lakes Powell and Mead December 2005
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Summary Report (Working Draft) Modeling of Reservoir Management Strategies for Lakes Powell and Mead December 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2013 11:06:06 AM
Creation date
7/20/2012 4:10:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Summary Report (Working Draft) Modeling of Reservoir Management Strategies for Lakes Powell and Mead December 2005
State
CO
Title
Summary Report (Working Draft) Modeling of Reservoir Management Strategies for Lakes Powell and Mead December 2005
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Modeling Results for <br />Colorado River Basin States' Modeling of <br />Colorado River and Reservoir Management Strategies <br />4.0 Sensitivity Analysis of Step <br />Shortage & Hybrid Alternatives <br />4.1 Hybrid <br />As discussed in Section 2, revisions were made to the Hybrid concept resulting in <br />a total of four Hybrid strategies. The goal of these revisions was to test the <br />sensitivity of two key parameters: the elevation at Mead at which Powell begins <br />to make balancing releases (Mead balancing elevation) and the elevation range <br />over which Powell would release a minimum of 7.48 MAF (7.48 band). All other <br />parameters were kept constant. For all Hybrid revisions the shortage strategy was <br />Step Shortage Original. <br />4.1.1 Powell & Mead 10th Elevation Percentiles <br />3,660 <br />3,640 <br />_ 3,620 <br />0 <br />3,600 <br />W <br />3,580 <br />3,560 <br />3,540 <br />3,520 <br />2005 <br />Figure 4 -1 <br />Lake Powell 10 "' Percentile Elevations <br />—0—Normal <br />—6— Hybrid <br />—* Hybrid rev1 <br />* Hybrid rev2 <br />-+F Hybrid rev3 <br />2010 2015 2020 2025 <br />Calendar Year <br />Figure 4 -1 shows that both Hybrid rev2 and Hybrid rev3 are consistently above <br />the Hybrid Original 10th percentile with the exception of one year. The reason for <br />this is that both of these revisions contain an elevation range of 50 ft under which <br />Powell releases 7.48 MAF, a 25 ft increase compared to the Hybrid original. Even <br />with the increased Mead balancing elevation, Hybrid rev3 is still higher than <br />Hybrid Original due to the increased 7.48 band. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.