My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development of New Water Resources For Southern Nevada :Agua Nueva" April 1993
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Development of New Water Resources For Southern Nevada :Agua Nueva" April 1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2012 4:13:11 PM
Creation date
7/19/2012 3:03:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Development of New Water Resources For Southern Nevada :Agua Nueva" April 1993. Spanish and English Translations.
State
NV
Author
Carollo, Black & Veatch
Title
Development of New Water Resources For Southern Nevada :Agua Nueva" April 1993
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The "Law of the River" is the most potent obstacle to this proposed project. To overcome it will <br />require a sustained effort to know and understand the balance of power in the states, the U.S. <br />Govt. and the Mexican Govt. <br />Another issue is the loss of power generation from Hoover Dam and other power generation <br />facilities downstream, by additional diversions from lake Mead. Arrangements (and /or <br />payment) for replacement power will have to be made for lost power generation. There is <br />already precedence for this type of arrangement in the Lower Colorado River Basin with <br />* diversions of some of Mexico's allocation by MWDSC through the San Diego County aqueduct <br />to Tijuana, Mexico. <br />Regarding lost power generation, another issue to be taken into account is the fact that a large <br />portion of the water delivered to Mexico is diverted at Imperial Dam into the All- American <br />Canal and released through the Pilot Knob Power Plant back to the river just above Morelos <br />Dam. If additional diversion at Lake Mead cuts into the flow going through Pilot Knob the <br />resulting lost power generation will have to be replaced also. Again, in this case, there should <br />be no problem in the early years of the water exchange project -- as long as the upstream <br />diversion does not exceed the minimum flow requirement in the river through Yuma. <br />A more serious issue may be the deterioration in water quality downstream of Hoover Dam due <br />to additional diversions from Lake Mead. This may affect all downstream users. The salinity of <br />the river could change somewhat due to the consumptive part of the diversion which makes <br />less water available for dilution of salty return flows downstream. The return flow portion of <br />the additional diversion adds to the salt level of the river because the TDS of the water <br />increases about 100 to 200 ppm on its pass through a municipal water and sewer system. <br />1 <br />A9 Carollo Black & Veatch <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.