Laserfiche WebLink
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO <br />Case No. 98CV5863, Court Room 17 (Consolidated Cases 98CV6048 and 98CV5935) <br />PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF <br />COLORADO FEDERATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, JAMES ABRAHAM, et al., <br />Plaintiffs, <br />V. <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL and ANDRE PETTIGREW in his official <br />capacity as Executive Director of the Department of Personnel, <br />Defendants. <br />INTRODUCTION <br />This case is an appeal of the State Department of Personnel (DOP) Director's decision to approve <br />and adopt a System Maintenance Study of the Environmental Protection Specialists (EPS) and <br />the Physical Science Researcher /Scientists (PSRS) classifications (JEL- 98 -11). <br />Pro se Plaintiffs Janis Illian, Stephen R. Miller, Jr., Sue Uppendahl, Bahman Hatami, Baltazar <br />Ray Alvarado, Jeff Baessler, Brian Hyde, John Van Sciver, Mark Uppendahl, Mark Matulik, <br />David McElhaney, George Van Slyke, (originally filed as Case No. 98CV6048), respectfully <br />submit this opening brief to address the fundamental flaws in the process and analysis used by <br />DOP in conducting, reviewing and adopting the System Maintenance Study. In addition, pro se <br />Plaintiffs join in the Opening Brief filed by the Colorado Federation of Public Employees (James <br />Abraham, et al.). <br />The issue of the action is whether the agency action is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse and <br />unwarranted exercise of discretion, based upon findings of fact that are clearly erroneous on the <br />whole record, or otherwise contrary to law. <br />On March 20, 1998, Defendant, issued a notice of proposed system changes (JEL- 98 -11) to <br />agency personnel administrators pursuant to §24 -50 -104 CRS. The proposed changes included <br />salary reductions for employees in the EPS and PSRS series ranging from 5% to 121 /2 %. <br />Each of the individually named pro se Plaintiffs appealed this decision to Defendant. Defendant <br />issued a decision dated June 24, 1998, denying the appeals of the individually named Plaintiffs. <br />Pursuant to §24- 50- 104(4)(d)(I), the pro se Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the District Court, <br />City and County of Denver, Colorado, seeking judicial review pursuant to §24 -4 -106. Pro se <br />Plaintiffs complained that the Defendant's actions were arbitrary and capricious, and an abuse <br />and unwarranted exercise of discretion or based upon findings of fact that on the whole record <br />are clearly erroneous and otherwise contrary to law. <br />Page 1 <br />