Laserfiche WebLink
preliminary research, decided to build the Park. (v.X, pp.23 -24, 27). The permitting and <br />approval process that was completed for the Park was very detailed. (v.X, pp.24 -40). Vail's <br />Town Manager, Robert McLaurin, testified that the purpose of the Park was to create a <br />recreational amenity that would draw visitors and spectators to the Town during the non -ski <br />season and help the Town's economy. (v.X, pp.21 -22, p.40,1.20- p.42,1.18). The Town Council <br />then hired Gary Lacy, renowned course designer, expert engineer, and boater, (v.X, p.26,1.17 -20; <br />v.XI, p.3, 1.12- p.4,1.7), to create a "world -class premiere" whitewater park that would attract the <br />greatest number of people to Town to broaden and stabilize the local economy. (v.X, pp.21, 40- <br />42; v.XI, p.6,1.13- p.7,1.13, p.74,1.10 -16). <br />To accomplish the Town Council's vision and intent, the Park was designed to offer a wide <br />range of recreation opportunities, ranging from the beginner to expert competitions. (v.X, p.41; <br />v.XI, p.6,1.13 -18). Mr. McLaurin testified that the success of the Park is "directly dependent" on <br />the ability to maintain the Park's flows, thus applying for a water right was critical. (v.X, p.60 <br />1.12 - p.61,1.25). <br />Pursuant to the MOU between Vail and the District, the District, as Vail's sole water <br />provider, agreed to apply for, obtain, and administer the water rights for the Park, along with all <br />the other water rights it holds and administers on behalf of the Town. (v.X, p.60,1.19-23; pp.79- <br />80). Vail initiated the MOU because the District is in the water rights business and the Town is <br />not. The MOU allows each entity to function within its area of expertise while protecting the <br />flows that have so immediately contributed to the success of the Park. (Id.). <br />B. The Park's Structures Were Designed and Constructed to Be Optimal at 400 c f s <br />Mr. Lacy designed the course to function optimally at 400 c.f.s. after taking into account <br />stream gradient, channel width, bank height, water availability and aesthetics (v.XI, p.7,1.2 - <br />Sb1549 -3- <br />