My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 9:02:18 AM
Creation date
7/13/2012 4:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
State
CO
Date
2/18/2003
Author
Porzak, Glenn E.; Bushong, Steven J.
Title
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A Approximately six to eight vertical feet below the bottom of the riverbed. <br />Q And how far into each streambank do they go? <br />A They -o a m inimum of 15 feet back into -the--o riginal s- <br />tream bank. <br />Q And how many tons of rock went into building the 15 structures that make <br />[up] Phase One and Phase Two? <br />A Well, there was approximately over 4000 tons of rock [] hauled in. for this <br />project. <br />Q How many tons of grout or cement went into building these structures? <br />A It was over 250 tons of concrete gravel pumped in. <br />Q And is material removed from the streambed as well? <br />A Yes, complete reconfiguration of [the] streambed. We removed and <br />moved approximately 8,000 tons of rock and cobble and sand and gravel. <br />The construction was extensive <br />Jeris Danielson, former Colorado State Engineer, v VIII, p.83 <br />Q When you compare the Breckenridge Course with those in Golden, Fort <br />Collins and Littleton, first with respect to extent of construction - - <br />A Breckenridge with the addition of Phase Two; in my opinion, rises at least <br />to the level of the construction in Golden, very extensive amounts of <br />engineering work done. Breckenridge far exceeds the construction that <br />occurred in the Fort Collins case and is certainly more intensive than the <br />Littleton Course. <br />3. CONTROL <br />Structures control water to create necessary - whitewater features <br />Gary Lacy, Breckenridge Whitewater Course Design Engineer, v VIII, p.17 <br />Q Mr. Lacy, if you design a course to be optimum at 500 c.f.s., is it then <br />designed to control the water at 500 c.f.s.? <br />As0007 -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.