My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 9:02:18 AM
Creation date
7/13/2012 4:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
State
CO
Date
2/18/2003
Author
Porzak, Glenn E.; Bushong, Steven J.
Title
Case No. 02SA226 Town of Breckenridge Answer Brief February 2003
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Q And your second opinion. <br />A Well, that there's_sigmficant economic value that's generated from the <br />Whitewater Course in Breckenridge. I think that the value is probably <br />over 1.4 million a year in the future and that's only counting - - you know <br />- - certain subset of things and if you capitalize that over 20 years, it's over <br />16 million dollars. <br />2. COURSE — DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND FUNCTION <br />The course design was intended to maximize the available flow and the number of users <br />Gary Lacy, Breckenridge Whitewater Course Design Engineer, v VIII, pp.3 -4 <br />"I was asked to design a course that would be available to all skill levels, <br />including novice or more beginner type paddlers through expert that - - so that <br />lots of members of the community could use it. It would be a project that would <br />attract lots of boaters to this area and would be - - have the potential for holding <br />events." <br />Gary Lacy, Breckenridge Whitewater Course Design Engineer, v VIII, p.4 <br />Q What factors do you consider in designing a course for an optimum flow <br />rate? <br />A Well, I considered a number of factors, looking at the channel, including <br />the channel width, the gradient, the stream geomorphology, such things as <br />depth of bedrock, or sand and gravel, cobble, what's the makeup of the <br />channel, the height of the banks, and some key physical characteristics <br />such as that. And then also taking into account the desires of the <br />community and the flow availability. <br />Course design was based on 500 c.fs. <br />Gary Lacy, Breckenridge Whitewater Course Design Engineer, v VIII, p.4 <br />Q At [what] flow rate did you design the course to be optimum? <br />A At 500 cubic feet per second. <br />As0007 -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.