Laserfiche WebLink
THE TOMICHI UNIT <br />THE COCHETOPA UNIT <br />Banana Ranch Reservoir <br />Amount <br />Priority No. <br />Diversion Structure No. <br />Monarch Reservoir <br />29,200.7 of <br />402 <br />312 <br />South Crookton Canal <br />277 cfs <br />404 <br />314 <br />THE COCHETOPA UNIT <br />Banana Ranch Reservoir <br />21,733 of <br />405 <br />315 <br />Flying M. Reservoir <br />15,457 of <br />406 <br />316 <br />Upper Cochetopa Reservoir <br />12,693.2 of <br />407 <br />317 <br />Cochetopa Meadows Ditch <br />Enlargement <br />11 cfs <br />408 <br />318 <br />Cochetopa Canal <br />240 cfs <br />409 <br />319 <br />Pass Creek Canal <br />45 cfs <br />410 <br />320 <br />Los Pinos Canal <br />51 cfs <br />411 <br />321 <br />Stubbs Gulch Canal <br />277 cfs <br />412 <br />322 <br />OHIO CREEK UNIT <br />Castleton Reservoir <br />9,000 of <br />572 <br />43 <br />Ohio Creek Canal <br />302 cfs <br />573 <br />350 <br />Taylor River Canal <br />302 cfs <br />574 <br />351 <br />East River Canal <br />82 cfs <br />575 <br />352 <br />appropriation date November 13, 1957 (Upper Gunnison District Rights); and, <br />WHEREAS, the February, 1959 Supplemental Report and Certification of Economic <br />Justification on the Curecanti Storage Unit of the Colorado River Storage Project in Colorado, <br />Pursuant to the Act ofApril 11, 1956 (70 Stat. 105) recognized the possibility that up to 60,000 acre - <br />feet (af) of in -basin depletions would occur upstream of the Aspinall Unit without affecting the <br />feasibility of the Aspinall Unit; and <br />Q <br />