My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 02CW038 Prehearing Statement nad Agreement June 2000
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 02CW038 Prehearing Statement nad Agreement June 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 8:58:57 AM
Creation date
7/13/2012 4:15:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 02CW038 Prehearing Statement nad Agreement June 2000 First page missing.
State
CO
Date
6/1/2000
Author
FLeming, Peter C.
Title
Case No. 02CW038 Prehearing Statement nad Agreement June 2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Case No. 02CW038, Water Division 4; Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Upper Gunnison River Water <br />Conservancy District, in the Gunnison River, in Gunnison County, Colorado <br />Prehearing Statement of Colorado River Water Conservation District <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District ( "UGRWCD ") forthe Administration <br />of Water Pursuant to the Subordination of Wayne N. Aspinall Unit Water Rights Within the <br />Upper Gunnison River Basin, dated June 1, 2000 ( "Subordination Agreement "), attached <br />hereto as Exhibit A. <br />III. CRWCD POSITION <br />A. The Exercise of UGRWCD's Claimed RICD Could Impair Maximum Utilization of the <br />State's Waters'and Efforts to Fully Develop and Place to Consumptive Beneficial Use <br />Colorado's Compact Entitlements by Interfering with the Full Implementation of the <br />Subordination Agreement. <br />The Subordination Agreement provides that the United States will operate the Aspinall Unit <br />to allow 60,000 acre feet of junior depletions annually by projects constructed to use water within <br />the Gunnison River Basin, even though those projects would divert under priorities equal or junior <br />to the priorities of the Aspinall Unit water rights. The intent of the Subordination Agreement is to <br />allow up to 60,000 acre feet of consumptive use by water rights junior to the Aspinall Unit within <br />the Upper Gunnison River Basin. The Subordination Agreement therefore promotes maximum <br />utilization of the state's waters and full development of the state's compact entitlements. The <br />claimed RICD could prevent the full utilization of the depletions allowed by the Subordination <br />Agreement by calling out junior water rights that would not otherwise be subject to call by the <br />Aspinall Unit. <br />The 60,000 acre feet of depletions contemplated by the Subordination Agreement are divided <br />by geographic location: 10,000 acre feet of annual water depletions are allowed in the Gunnison <br />River Basin drainage between Crystal Dam and Morrow Point Dam; 10,000 acre feet of annual <br />depletions are allowed in the drainage between Morrow Point Dam and Blue Mesa Dam; and 40,000 <br />acre feet of annual depletions are allowed in the drainage above Blue Mesa Dam. By subordinating <br />the Aspinall Unit water rights to the 60,000 acre feet of depletions, the United States has agreed that <br />in -basin water users may continue to divert when a call is placed on the Gunnison River by the <br />United States under the Aspinall Unit water rights. <br />Under the terms of the Subordination Agreement, the CRWCD and UGRWCD are <br />responsible for representing the various in -basin water users who benefit from the subordination. <br />Specifically, the CRWCD is responsible for representing the interests of individuals and entities who <br />divert water upstream of either Crystal Dam or Morrow Point Dam and use the diverted water <br />downstream of Blue Mesa Dam. Although the claimed RICD is nonconsumptive, individuals and <br />entities in that geographic area could be adversely affected by the claimed RICD if their water use <br />plan involves an exchange of water Itpstream 17 the lurnison Whitewater Course or otherwise <br />involves reservoir operation,, ups: am of tlt, prol.iosed Gunnison Whitewater Course, e.g., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.