Laserfiche WebLink
7. Required <br />board is tonzu�:cerb�ufactual findings rok}�ve10 each l�K�I� . 8 37- <br />92-l0Z(6),C.R|.^. The statutory dc�uid000fl��J0 othat the »nn|�mntclaim only the <br />minimum ` ' stream flow" that the flow would be used for u reasonable recreation experience in and <br />on the vvutcr' and that the Dory be diverted, captured, controlled, and placed to bono[icio| use. <br />The required findings on factors are: <br />u. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RlCZ, in the uu <br />ouotu claimed, would <br />impair the ability n f Colorado to fully develop and place tocou000)Viivo beneficial use ds <br />cVupuu{ entitlements. The 6nnod, iu making this finding, may consider, <br />but is not Urudcd <br />to, the following: � <br />i. The amount and location of remaining unappropriated entitlement waters <br />in the basin in question and at the FlICD point nfdiversion; <br />ii. The proximity of the [llC[)iothe state line; <br />iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage <br />which may be utilized by those Who would place the water to consumptive <br />beneficial use, <br />iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for <br />consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; <br />V. Exchange within the state that may be udvozue|v <br />impacted by the <br />existence oP the 8JCI).; <br />vi. Whether the basin is over-appropriated; <br />vii. The effect on other decreed, existing undecreed, or reasonably foreseeable uses of <br />the amount of water claimed; <br />viii. \Vbudher aRJC[) ubit]dm vvo1urs from uconsumptive use that would otherwise be <br />available under u particular compact; <br />ix. Whether beneficial consumptive water use opportunities upstream from the <br />claimed RICD would further develop Colorado's compact entitlements and would <br />be impaired by applicant's sought for stream flow amounts; and, <br />X. Wbo1 provisions in the application are proposed for reducing or canceling the <br />0CD? <br />h. Whether the R]C[) appropriation im for oo appropriate reach of stream for the intended <br />use. Tbeboard, in making this finding. may consider, but is not limited to, the following: <br />[ The nature of the identified reasonable recreational experience for vvbkch the <br />RDCDis <br />ii. The leno�hofthe � <br />8OCDc�uc <br />iii. - tbc RICD can he adequately measured and administered through the <br />proposed reach; <br />iv. Whether the applicant has complied with all federal and state statutes and <br />rogu|udnus regarding flooding, flood control, the one-hundred your flood <br />elevations, and river cbonoo1 manipulation, or vvhcLber the applicant ogceco to <br />include uternz and condition in the decree that it will comply with all federal and <br />atnLs ytoioteu and regulations regarding flooding, flood control, the ono'boudccd <br />year flood elevations, and river channel manipulation; <br />V. Whether the RICD in its proposed location can adequately pass all flows up to <br />3 <br />