My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 01SA252 Brief of Amici Curiae February 2002
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 01SA252 Brief of Amici Curiae February 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 10:27:38 AM
Creation date
7/12/2012 4:20:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 01SA252 Brief of Amici Curiae February 2002
State
CO
Date
2/7/2002
Author
Robbins, David W.; Montfomery, Dennis M.; Wells, Patricia L.; Lawrence, Kim R.; Maynes, Frank E.; Dingess, John M.; Miller, Lee E.
Title
Case No. 01SA252 Brief of Amici Curiae February 2002
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. The Course of Proceedings and the Disposition Below. <br />The application, which was filed on December 30, 1998, claimed monthly and hourly <br />cubic feet per second (c.f.s.) designations, ranging from 70 c.f.s. in December through March to <br />1,000 c.f.s. in May through July. (Record V.3, at 542, 545, 549.) Golden's kayak park consists <br />of seven separate water deflector devices, which Golden designated as diversion structures. (Id. <br />p. 542). The city plans to expand this park to include ten more devices. (Id. at 548). Golden <br />claimed that these devices were designed to divert and control water and put the Clear Creek <br />water flow to beneficial use when kayakers and/or other boaters used the course. (Id. at 545). <br />This appeal arises out of the water court's final decree. The Water Judge approved <br />Golden's application for conditional and absolute water rights. In doing so, the court awarded <br />absolute and conditional rights for the existing devices as well as conditional rights for the <br />proposed devices. <br />C. Statement of Facts <br />Pertinent findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the Water Judge are as <br />follows: <br />6. Absolute and Conditional Amounts. Golden is entitled to an <br />absolute decree for those flow rates that have been put to <br />beneficial use, i.e., actually used to date by boaters running the <br />.Course. The absolute water rights claimed by Golden in the <br />application were based, inter alia, upon measured flows at the <br />Clear Creek Gage when the course was in use by boaters.... <br />Where the evidence has tied a given use to a <br />contemporaneous flow rate, the court concludes that the <br />maximum such coincidence of use and flow rate, in a given <br />month, establishes flow rate for that month for which Golden is <br />entitled to an absolute decree. <br />The court also distinguishes between day and night use, <br />inasmuch as there is a substantial difference in density of use <br />before and after dark.... [P]erfection of nighttime rights must <br />be established from uses that occur between one -hour after <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.