My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 01SA252 Amici Curiae Brief of Colorado Springs Utilities February 2002
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 01SA252 Amici Curiae Brief of Colorado Springs Utilities February 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 10:26:10 AM
Creation date
7/12/2012 4:20:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 01SA252 Amici Curiae Brief of Colorado Springs Utilities February 2002
State
CO
Date
2/7/2002
Author
Pifher, Mark T.; Sinor, Doglas; Miller, Lee E.
Title
Case No. 01SA252 Amici Curiae Brief of Colorado Springs Utilities February 2002
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 2 <br />11. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 2 <br />III. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 3 <br />IV. AGRUMENT ............ 1 4 <br />A. INTRODUCTION 4 <br />B. GOLDEN FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE "CONTROL" OF THE WATER ... 6 <br />C. AN EXPANSIVE READING OF THE "CONTROL" AND BENEFICIAL USE <br />REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS, .. 8 <br />1. Stateline Impacts ...................................... 9 <br />2. Impact on Exchanges .................................. 10 <br />3. Similar "Instream" Use Decrees Could be Obtained .......... 11 <br />4. Additional "Non-Commercial" Filings Can be Anticipated .... 12 <br />D. RECOGNITION OF THE DECREE WOULD UNDERMINE THE <br />DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM BENEFICIAL USE ....................... 13 <br />1. The Amount is Not Reasonable and Appropriate ............ 14 <br />2. There is No Evidence That the Claimed Appropriation <br />Employed Reasonably Efficient Practices .................. 15 <br />3. There is No Evidence That the Appropriation Was <br />Accomplished Without Waste ........................... 17 <br />V. CONCLUSION ........................... .............................19 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.