Laserfiche WebLink
I. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 2 <br />11. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 2 <br />III. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 3 <br />IV. AGRUMENT ............ 1 4 <br />A. INTRODUCTION 4 <br />B. GOLDEN FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE "CONTROL" OF THE WATER ... 6 <br />C. AN EXPANSIVE READING OF THE "CONTROL" AND BENEFICIAL USE <br />REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS, .. 8 <br />1. Stateline Impacts ...................................... 9 <br />2. Impact on Exchanges .................................. 10 <br />3. Similar "Instream" Use Decrees Could be Obtained .......... 11 <br />4. Additional "Non-Commercial" Filings Can be Anticipated .... 12 <br />D. RECOGNITION OF THE DECREE WOULD UNDERMINE THE <br />DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM BENEFICIAL USE ....................... 13 <br />1. The Amount is Not Reasonable and Appropriate ............ 14 <br />2. There is No Evidence That the Claimed Appropriation <br />Employed Reasonably Efficient Practices .................. 15 <br />3. There is No Evidence That the Appropriation Was <br />Accomplished Without Waste ........................... 17 <br />V. CONCLUSION ........................... .............................19 <br />I <br />