My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Case No. 98CW448 Stipulated Facts February 2001
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Case No. 98CW448 Stipulated Facts February 2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 10:36:32 AM
Creation date
7/12/2012 4:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 98CW448 Stipulated Facts February 2001
State
CO
Date
2/25/2001
Author
Porzak, Glenn E.; Bushong, Steven J..; Holloran, Michael J.; Sims, Steven O.; Scheider, Susan
Title
Case No. 98CW448 Stipulated Facts February 2001
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. Golden is entitled to a water right quantified according to instantaneous peak <br />flows as long as the other elements of appropriation are present. <br />g. The water rights sought by Golden are capable of administration and the USGS <br />gage at Golden is sufficient for use for -this purpose. Notwithstanding this <br />stipulated fact, the State reserves the right to request inclusion in any decree <br />entered in this case a term that recognizes that the USGS gage at Golden is not <br />under the control of the State, and that its use for day to day administration <br />cannot be deemed accurate for anything more than long term measuring issues. <br />Though, as noted above, the parties agree that the water rights can be <br />administered by the gage, the accuracy of the gage is disputed. Nothing in this <br />paragraph can be construed as an admission or assertion that either the State or <br />Golden should be responsible for a replacement gage should that become <br />necessary . <br />9. Boaters have been present on the water in the White Water Course when flows <br />have been in excess of 1000 cfs. <br />10. The parties stipulate to an appropriation date for the absolute and conditional <br />rights claimed of December 30, 1998. <br />11. Golden satisfied the elements of forming an intent and making an overt, physical <br />act constituting. the first step toward diversion and application of the claimed <br />water rights to a beneficial use and Golden has pursued the appropriation of the <br />conditional water right with diligence during the time since forming the intent <br />and taking the overt act. <br />12. Golden has satisfied the can and will elements of § 37- 92- 305(9)(b) C.R.S. <br />(2000) for the conditional portions of the application. <br />13. The legal descriptions of the control structures set forth in the application are <br />accurate. <br />14. The source for both the Whitewater Course and the Course Extension is Clear <br />Creek, a tributary to the South Platte River. <br />15. Clear Creek is generally over- appropriated. However, at times of flood and <br />heavy runoff there are periods of free river. <br />16. Mr. Thompson is an expert in the fields of water rights engineering and water <br />rights administration. <br />17. Dr. Danielson is an expert in the fields of water rights engineering and water right <br />administration. <br />-2- <br />PH0190 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.