My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City of Colorado Springs v. David White November 1998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
City of Colorado Springs v. David White November 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 8:51:56 AM
Creation date
7/12/2012 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
City of Colorado Springs v. David White November 23 1998. No. 97SC685
State
CO
Date
11/23/1998
Title
City of Colorado Springs v. David White November 1998
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
967 P.2d 1042, City of Colorado Springs v. White, (Colo. 1998) <br />[18] Witnesses X222 <br />410 - - -- <br />410I1 Competency <br />410II(D) Confidential Relations and Privileged <br />Communications <br />410k222 Evidence as to Nature and <br />Circumstances of Communication or <br />Other Subject- Matter. <br />Where the government has met the procedural <br />requirements for assertion of the deliberative <br />process privilege, the privilege presumptively <br />applies. <br />[19] Witnesses «216(1) <br />410 - - -- <br />410II Competency <br />410II(D) Confidential Relations and Privileged <br />Communications <br />410k216 Communications to or Information <br />Acquired by Public Officers <br />410k216(1) In General; Official or <br />Governmental Privilege. <br />The trial court should honor the government's <br />claim of deliberative process privilege unless the <br />party seeking discovery makes a preliminary <br />showing that the material may not be privileged or <br />that there is some.necessity for its production. <br />[20] Witnesses <°�;-223 <br />410 - - -- <br />410II Competency <br />4101I(D) Confidential Relations and Privileged <br />Communications <br />410k223 Determination as to Admissibility. <br />In most cases, where the party seeking discovery <br />of material allegedly protected by the governmental <br />deliberative process privilege makes a sufficient <br />showing of need, the court should grant an in <br />camera inspection to determine whether the material <br />is privileged, to sever privileged from non- <br />privileged material if severability is feasible, and to <br />weigh the government's need for confidentiality <br />against the litigant's need for production. <br />[21] Records «54 <br />326 - - -- <br />326II Public Access <br />326II(B) General Statutory Disclosure <br />Requirements <br />326k53 Matters Subject to Disclosure; <br />Exemptions <br />326k54 In General. <br />[See headnote text below] <br />Page 4 <br />[21]Records (E.�;- 57 <br />326 - - -- <br />326I1 Public Access <br />326II(B) General Statutory Disclosure <br />Requirements <br />326k53 Matters Subject to Disclosure; <br />Exemptions <br />326k57 Internal Memoranda or Letters; <br />Executive Privilege. <br />The exemption for "privileged information" in the <br />open records laws includes various common law <br />evidentiary privileges, such as the attorney- client <br />privilege and the attorney work product privilege. <br />West's C.R.S.A. § 24- 72- 202(6)(a)(I). <br />[22] Records (2=57 <br />326 - - -- <br />326II Public Access <br />326II(B) General Statutory Disclosure <br />Requirements <br />326k53 Matters Subject to Disclosure; <br />Exemptions <br />326k57 Internal Memoranda or Letters; <br />Executive Privilege. <br />The exemption for "privileged information" in the <br />open records laws includes material protected by the <br />governmental deliberative process privilege. West's <br />C.R.S.A. § 24- 72- 202(6)(a)(I). <br />[23] Records- X57 <br />326 - - -- <br />326II Public Access <br />326II(B) General Statutory Disclosure <br />Requirements <br />326k53 . Matters Subject to Disclosure; <br />Exemptions <br />326k57 Internal Memoranda or Letters; <br />Executive Privilege. <br />Amendments to open records laws which <br />specifically exclude from exemption various <br />materials related to elected officials, including work <br />product prepared for elected officials, certain <br />correspondence without a connection to the exercise <br />of an official's functions, and confidential <br />communications between constituents and elected <br />officials, did not abrogate common -law <br />governmental deliberative process privilege, and <br />thus, the privilege remains viable and applicable to a <br />public records request. Laws 1996, p. 1481, § 4. <br />[24] Statutes X222 <br />361 - - -- <br />Copyright (c) West Group 2001 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.