My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Yampa River Recreational Uses & Recommended Flows
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Yampa River Recreational Uses & Recommended Flows
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 9:07:38 AM
Creation date
7/12/2012 4:19:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Yampa River Recreational Uses & Recommended Flows
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Date
6/2/2005
Author
Uppendahl, Mark
Title
Yampa River Recreational Uses & Recommended Flows
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UU WILULIFt HABIIRI Fax :303 - 291 -7456 Jun 3 2005 13:25 P.03 <br />Yamua River Data Summary <br />CDOW analyzed stream cross section data collected to date using the R2CROSS program. The R2CROSS <br />output was evaluated using the methods described in Nehring (1979) and Espegren (1996), In addition to the <br />stream cross section data collected, the CDOW used the Tennant Method (a.k.a. Montana Method) to <br />evaluate Instream flow recommendations above and below those recommended by the R2CROSS method. <br />The Tennant Method is based on percentages of average annual flow derived from recorded hydrologic <br />records. In this case the Yampa River gage at Steamboat Springs (Gage No. 09239500) was used. Mr. <br />Neumann's biologic conclusions are not based upon any scientific method. <br />The CDOW has reviewed the data collected to date and based on that review believes the recreational <br />activities identified by POSR in Table 2 have no correlation to biological resource impacts as Mr. Neumann <br />stated. As long as flows exceed 280 cfs on the Yampa River, there would be no biological impacts. <br />Similarly, the CDOW also believes it is not only possible but likely, that most, if not all, of the identified <br />recreational activities could occur at flows lower than 280 cfs, without impacting the biological resources of <br />the Yampa River. Thus, Mr. Neumann's statement that, for example, 800 cfs is the minimum flow at which <br />rafting could ever occur without damage to the biologic resources is unsupported and contradicted by <br />CDOW data. <br />If you have any questions regarding the above opinion or any of the attached information, please feel free to <br />contact me at (303)- 291.7267. <br />Sincerely, <br />Mark Uppendahl <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />Instrearn Flow Program Coordinator <br />Cc: Jay Skinner, CDOW Water Unit Program Manager — w/o attachments <br />Sherman Hebein, CDOW Senior Fish Biologist — West Regions — w/o attachments <br />Billie Atkinson, CDOW Aquatic Biologist — w/o attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.