-thee by t31dr[tf i diff -, tar'k �1 � -.lrc � 1).rl.;:
<br />l ,'_7 tom_ �'.J lt.i)a.�), r•. � N�.<kl -. r_t;,I ; ,., - - -
<br />t1a:Ilt tr
<br />J,:l?atn: ?tli{zrstor( t °Y rl }� ' �1zirT� ale�r.' lr ' i. 7r
<br />., 1 •. 7 tY
<br />lit - i r t E
<br />(i � � r 1 i�0 E1t 1l '::,1 r :14j i t 7 c n ttttlr_ b`[' [
<br />M;3S not tl P t PSt llse rlf tllt_ "5Lc1tP.S ip ec,ou esO�tl -t i0: 1h�
<br />ntik_� lie tutJ of the hydiogmph1, ' 1' obb' ,<1�1�11IErI ; }li7 11'i.?
<br />buff2lo, this argument was appealing as a means to an end, since
<br />to the method for harnessing the river's hj)l ll.O ?N.
<br />they agreed that farms and suburbs should take priority over
<br />" But the new state law," he rioted, "says municipalities are only
<br />kayaking.Butitwas also heresy because itconceded aroleforthe
<br />entitled to a' reasonable' recreationuse-- whatever that means.
<br />state in deciding howwater should be used. The AG's office, how-
<br />The issue of whether prior appropriation allows recreational
<br />ever, was desperate to head off a ruling that would divert water
<br />kayak courses is not yet settled in this state"
<br />from the growing suburbs east of the Front Range. To hell with
<br />150 years of the Colorado doctrine, Sims and the water board
<br />RATHER THAN ENDING COLORADO'S WATER WARS, THE
<br />seemed to be saying; we need to protect this water.
<br />supreme court's decision dispersed them across the state. What
<br />Judge Hays couldn't believe what he was hearing. He gave
<br />was once a fight between the dry, populated east and the wetter
<br />Golden its l,000 cfs and spanked the state for sullying the purity
<br />west has become one between big cities and-fax-flung river
<br />of the Colorado doctrine. Golden's water rights could not be denied
<br />towns. Kayak courses are coming to small towns like Steamboat
<br />because of "concern for the quantities that should be left for
<br />Springs and Gunnison. But the people aren't. They're moving to
<br />future water users," Hays wrote. First in time, first in right. Period,
<br />cities like Denver, Aurora, and Colorado Springs, which need
<br />So poorly did the state fare in Hays's courtroom that panicked
<br />more water to grow.
<br />water board members ran to the legislature In the middle of the
<br />trial. Hastily, they'd written a bill to eliminate the right to divert
<br />Some water planners have their eye on a long -term solution:
<br />the Big Straw, which is, quite literally, a pipe &earn. The idea is to
<br />tap the Colorado River just before the river
<br />jumps the border into Utah. (That's legal
<br />under the interstate water compacts
<br />because, to date, Colorado hasn't had the
<br />r capacity to use its full allotment.) The Big
<br />Straw would capture the water and send
<br />it 200 miles east, into the kitchen sinks of Denver and Colorado
<br />Springs. But with cost estimates running as high as $i5 billion,
<br />the voters have balked. In November, they defeated a referendum
<br />to float a $2 billion bond issue that would have paid for new
<br />water projects.
<br />Which leaves the booming 'burbs coveting the water that's
<br />used by their neighbors. Take, for instance, Colorado Springs. The
<br />city expects to outgrow its current water supply in four years as
<br />its population grows from 372,000 to an estimated 427,000. So in
<br />the best Colorado tradition, Colorado Springs is asserting its sen-
<br />ior rights to the water and moving across its neighbor's land to
<br />grab more. The problem is, its southern neighbor —the city of
<br />Pueblo —needs that water. For a kayak course.
<br />Every town with a stream could roll a boulder into the
<br />water, call it a kayak course, and lock up the river's
<br />a river for a kayak course. The Colorado Assembly rejected an
<br />outright ban, but passed a Jaw allowing towns eager to build
<br />kayak courses only enough water to ensure a "reasonable recre-
<br />ational experience."
<br />Meanwhile, the state appealed Hays's ruling. Then Vail and
<br />Breckenridge won their water court'trials, and the cases were
<br />bundled with Golden's for one "super kayak" showdown before
<br />the Colorado Supreme Court.
<br />There were 43 friend -of- the -court , briefs filed —an extraordi-
<br />nary outpouring of interest evenfor a high - profile case— andthey
<br />were almost evenly split. Lining up with the state were the farm-
<br />ers and the expanding metropolises of Colorado Springs, Denver,
<br />and its suburb, Aurora. Supporting Golden were smaller, tourist -
<br />hungry towns like Boulder, Leadville, Silverthome, and Grand
<br />Junction. Trout Unlimited argued that using the river's flow for
<br />kayak courses was good for its ecology. Recreation groups touted
<br />the economic yield from river sports, which the Colorado River
<br />R Outfitters Association put at $45 million a year for the state.
<br />Porzak and Sims replayed their battle before six supreme court
<br />justices and a packed gallery. The seventh judge on the court had
<br />been forced to recuse himself because he'd formerly represented
<br />a state irrigation district that was siding with the Water Conser-
<br />vation Board: That judge was Gregory Hobbs —the court's most
<br />knowledgeable judge on the subject of water lawn
<br />Without Hobbs to guide them, the other members of the court
<br />deadlocked, 3 -3. Last May, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a
<br />three- sentence verdict: In light of the tie vote, Golden's victory in
<br />the water court would stand. Terry Tucker and his playboat
<br />would enjoy the river's full roar.
<br />Hobbs naturally can't say how he would have voted on the
<br />Golden case. But the veteran jurist gets a gleam in his eye when
<br />52 Juiyl August 2oc4
<br />COLORADO SPRINGS WAS ONCE A MODEST ENCLAVE OF MIN -
<br />ers, military personnel, and their families. It's now a sprawling
<br />bedroom community. Seventy miles south of Denver, the city is
<br />growing so fast that you can watch it expand, framing stud by
<br />framing stud. At the eastern boundary of a suburban develop-
<br />ment called Springs Ranch, hundreds of acres of new three -bed-
<br />room, three-bathhouses curl around asphalt streets with names
<br />like Campstool Drive. Every driveway seems to boast a new SUV
<br />or heavy- payload truck. Lawns are as green as they come.
<br />Colorado Springs has going for it decent schools and reason-
<br />ably cheap housing. It also has a clean -cut, family - friendly cul-
<br />ture— the Air Force Academy, the U.S. Olympic Training Center,
<br />and the Christian group Focus on the Family are all based there.
<br />And then there's the high Rockies location. "The weather's nice,
<br />and I can run up to the mountains anytime I want," said Diana
<br />Calkins, a 58- year -old floral shop owner who recently moved into
<br />Springs Ranch.
<br />
|