Laserfiche WebLink
­-thee by t31dr[tf i diff -, tar'k �1 � -.lrc � 1).rl.;: <br />l ,'_7 tom_ �'.J lt.i)a.�), r•. � N�.<kl -. r_t;,I ; ,., - - - <br />t1a:Ilt tr <br />J,:l?atn: ?tli{zrstor( t °Y rl }� ' �1zirT� ale�r.' lr ' i. 7r <br />., 1 •. 7 tY <br />lit - i r t E <br />(i � � r 1 i�0 E1t 1l '::,1 r :14j i t 7 c n ttttlr_ b`­[' [ <br />M;3S not tl P t PSt llse rlf tllt_ "5Lc1tP.S ip ec,ou esO�tl -t i0: 1h� <br />ntik_� lie tutJ of the hydiogmph1, ' 1' obb' ,<1�1�11IErI ; }li7 11'i.? <br />buff2lo, this argument was appealing as a means to an end, since <br />to the method for harnessing the river's hj)l ll.O ?N. <br />they agreed that farms and suburbs should take priority over <br />" But the new state law," he rioted, "says municipalities are only <br />kayaking.Butitwas also heresy because itconceded aroleforthe <br />entitled to a' reasonable' recreationuse-- whatever that means. <br />state in deciding howwater should be used. The AG's office, how- <br />The issue of whether prior appropriation allows recreational <br />ever, was desperate to head off a ruling that would divert water <br />kayak courses is not yet settled in this state" <br />from the growing suburbs east of the Front Range. To hell with <br />150 years of the Colorado doctrine, Sims and the water board <br />RATHER THAN ENDING COLORADO'S WATER WARS, THE <br />seemed to be saying; we need to protect this water. <br />supreme court's decision dispersed them across the state. What <br />Judge Hays couldn't believe what he was hearing. He gave <br />was once a fight between the dry, populated east and the wetter <br />Golden its l,000 cfs and spanked the state for sullying the purity <br />west has become one between big cities and-fax-flung river <br />of the Colorado doctrine. Golden's water rights could not be denied <br />towns. Kayak courses are coming to small towns like Steamboat <br />because of "concern for the quantities that should be left for <br />Springs and Gunnison. But the people aren't. They're moving to <br />future water users," Hays wrote. First in time, first in right. Period, <br />cities like Denver, Aurora, and Colorado Springs, which need <br />So poorly did the state fare in Hays's courtroom that panicked <br />more water to grow. <br />water board members ran to the legislature In the middle of the <br />trial. Hastily, they'd written a bill to eliminate the right to divert <br />Some water planners have their eye on a long -term solution: <br />the Big Straw, which is, quite literally, a pipe &earn. The idea is to <br />tap the Colorado River just before the river <br />jumps the border into Utah. (That's legal <br />under the interstate water compacts <br />because, to date, Colorado hasn't had the <br />r capacity to use its full allotment.) The Big <br />Straw would capture the water and send <br />it 200 miles east, into the kitchen sinks of Denver and Colorado <br />Springs. But with cost estimates running as high as $i5 billion, <br />the voters have balked. In November, they defeated a referendum <br />to float a $2 billion bond issue that would have paid for new <br />water projects. <br />Which leaves the booming 'burbs coveting the water that's <br />used by their neighbors. Take, for instance, Colorado Springs. The <br />city expects to outgrow its current water supply in four years as <br />its population grows from 372,000 to an estimated 427,000. So in <br />the best Colorado tradition, Colorado Springs is asserting its sen- <br />ior rights to the water and moving across its neighbor's land to <br />grab more. The problem is, its southern neighbor —the city of <br />Pueblo —needs that water. For a kayak course. <br />Every town with a stream could roll a boulder into the <br />water, call it a kayak course, and lock up the river's <br />a river for a kayak course. The Colorado Assembly rejected an <br />outright ban, but passed a Jaw allowing towns eager to build <br />kayak courses only enough water to ensure a "reasonable recre- <br />ational experience." <br />Meanwhile, the state appealed Hays's ruling. Then Vail and <br />Breckenridge won their water court'trials, and the cases were <br />bundled with Golden's for one "super kayak" showdown before <br />the Colorado Supreme Court. <br />There were 43 friend -of- the -court , briefs filed —an extraordi- <br />nary outpouring of interest evenfor a high - profile case— andthey <br />were almost evenly split. Lining up with the state were the farm- <br />ers and the expanding metropolises of Colorado Springs, Denver, <br />and its suburb, Aurora. Supporting Golden were smaller, tourist - <br />hungry towns like Boulder, Leadville, Silverthome, and Grand <br />Junction. Trout Unlimited argued that using the river's flow for <br />kayak courses was good for its ecology. Recreation groups touted <br />the economic yield from river sports, which the Colorado River <br />R Outfitters Association put at $45 million a year for the state. <br />Porzak and Sims replayed their battle before six supreme court <br />justices and a packed gallery. The seventh judge on the court had <br />been forced to recuse himself because he'd formerly represented <br />a state irrigation district that was siding with the Water Conser- <br />vation Board: That judge was Gregory Hobbs —the court's most <br />knowledgeable judge on the subject of water lawn <br />Without Hobbs to guide them, the other members of the court <br />deadlocked, 3 -3. Last May, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a <br />three- sentence verdict: In light of the tie vote, Golden's victory in <br />the water court would stand. Terry Tucker and his playboat <br />would enjoy the river's full roar. <br />Hobbs naturally can't say how he would have voted on the <br />Golden case. But the veteran jurist gets a gleam in his eye when <br />52 Juiyl August 2oc4 <br />COLORADO SPRINGS WAS ONCE A MODEST ENCLAVE OF MIN - <br />ers, military personnel, and their families. It's now a sprawling <br />bedroom community. Seventy miles south of Denver, the city is <br />growing so fast that you can watch it expand, framing stud by <br />framing stud. At the eastern boundary of a suburban develop- <br />ment called Springs Ranch, hundreds of acres of new three -bed- <br />room, three-bathhouses curl around asphalt streets with names <br />like Campstool Drive. Every driveway seems to boast a new SUV <br />or heavy- payload truck. Lawns are as green as they come. <br />Colorado Springs has going for it decent schools and reason- <br />ably cheap housing. It also has a clean -cut, family - friendly cul- <br />ture— the Air Force Academy, the U.S. Olympic Training Center, <br />and the Christian group Focus on the Family are all based there. <br />And then there's the high Rockies location. "The weather's nice, <br />and I can run up to the mountains anytime I want," said Diana <br />Calkins, a 58- year -old floral shop owner who recently moved into <br />Springs Ranch. <br />