My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Succession Planning Update June 2003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Succession Planning Update June 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2012 9:05:54 AM
Creation date
7/11/2012 4:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Succession Planning Update June 2003. Workforce impact, fiscal impact and suggested solutions
State
CO
Date
6/1/2003
Title
Succession Planning Update June 2003
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Operating Principles/Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Y <br />Suggested Solutions <br />Much has been written in recent years concerning methods of recruiting and retaining older workers. To <br />retain older workers, however, DNR would have to compete successfully against the State's excellent <br />retirement benefits; these benefits are the reason many "baby boomers" entered state service in the first <br />place. A greater inducement, in DNR, is simply the love many of our employees have for their jobs; we <br />need not worry about retaining these people. <br />Before the retirement- eligible employees are gone, however, it is in the best interests of DNR and the <br />State to somehow preserve the skills and knowledge they represent. The job market should always <br />contain younger people with education in the natural sciences, and we do not anticipate trouble filling <br />entry-level positions. However, the skills of our current leadership, and the specialized knowledge of <br />employees who are authorities in their fields must be passed on or cultivated in the next generation of <br />workers. This should be the legacy of the present generation of the Department of Natural Resources. <br />Some methods for accomplishing this might include: <br />Mentoring <br />This method would be useful for passing on specialized knowledge from employees who are staff <br />authorities and senior authorities. Junior employees with the education and background to understand the <br />specialized area may volunteer to learn from the authority. Persons so trained would have an edge in any <br />selection process, as would outside applicants with specialized training. To ensure fairness, such <br />opportunities should be available to all qualified employees. <br />Rotational Assignments <br />Similar to mentoring, nominees in a program rotate through different assignments in their division, to <br />gain broader experience and knowledge. This method is being used in certain other state departments. <br />Employees must be nominated for the program; assignments generally last six months. Employees in the <br />program receive their regular pay, without differentials. <br />Training <br />Some skills of supervisors, managers, and executives can only be learned by experience; however, sorne <br />skills can be taught. Knowledge of processes for the . division, department, and state government is <br />valuable, and should be taught before the employee advances to the management level. The Division of <br />Wildlife, in recent years, has developed a training curriculum for future supervisors; perhaps this could be <br />adapted and offered on a department -wide basis. <br />Discussion Items <br />Would a rotational - assignment program be feasible in DNR divisions? <br />Would it be valuable for DNR to implement formal succession planning at a department level? <br />Mab mere) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.