Laserfiche WebLink
rMIR <br />division for another's expenses. The Department indicates that program needs may change and thus <br />expenses incurred by either division could change, In the even this happens, the Department indicates <br />it would be forced to submit supplemental or decision item requests to adjust the necessary spending <br />authority in each division. Staff believes this process should be undertaken in the event changes <br />occur. The Committee approved continuation of a footnote requesting the separate program <br />components be submitted as individual decision item requests, This footnote expresses legislative <br />intent that expenditures for programs such as the RIISS be requested in the appropriate separate <br />components, <br />Staff recommends funding from the Water Conservation Board Construction Fund, T1 a staff <br />recommendation does not imply this funding methodology to be one -time or ongoing; future fi inding <br />methodology would be addressed at the appropriate. time, The staff recommendation includes the <br />following specificv. <br />Funding for the 3.0 FTE requested, including 2.0 FTE in the CWCB and 1.0 FTE in the <br />Division of Water Resources. Staff recommends funding at the 2002 -03 minimum salary <br />level, which is higher than the requested amount. <br />Partial funding (half of the requested amount) for contract personal services for the C CB. <br />Because software maintenance, modeling updates, and database maintenance are Brit cal to <br />maintenance and expansion, staff is recommending an exemption from the Com ittee's <br />common policy on IT. however, the decision item narrative indicates partial funding would <br />be used for examining the potential for improvement to the DSS (such as including d ught <br />simulation). This type of expenditure is not time- critical, and is therefore not recommended. <br />Funding for the purchase of GIS imagery, Similar to modeling updates and <br />maintenance. GIS imagery is essential to system operation. <br />No new funding for PC mplacernent or licenses, per the Committee's IT Common <br />Travel for both CWCB and Water Resources, largely in support of data collection, <br />acreage updates, and compact modeling. <br />No fleet or variable vehicle expenditures. The request includes 12 months of funding <br />4 wheel -drive vehicle for 1.0 FTE hydrographer in the Division of Water Resources the <br />funded in FY 2001-02. The Department indicates that FTE is currently driving his <br />vehicle. It is not clear why a leased vchicle would now be required; therefore, staff <br />recommending the vehicle or the associated variable vehicle expenses. <br />k tv G{ c, r' t <br />One -time capital outlay costs associated with the 3.0 FTE. <br />21- Mar -2002 <br />for 1 <br />was <br />own <br />s not <br />NA' .fig <br />S0'd,r 0STZ998202 0 ar Wa TS: 90 ZO- TZ -dHW <br />