My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 11:27:40 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 11:29:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Engineering Analysis and Design of River Facilities including Bed and Bank Modifications and Low Head Dams for River Parks, Salida, Buena Vista and Other Sites in Colorado
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/10/2005
Author
ASCG INCORPORATED
Title
Professional Engineering Problems Recreational In-Channel Diversion (RICD) Application Support
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Map
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Flood impacts <br />At flows above 1800 cfs the structures will continue to create a hydraulic and contain the <br />flow, but the play feature will become less significant until the structure will be overtopped. <br />When the structure is overtopped the feature will not affect the floodway and will not affect the <br />100-yeaz floodplain. These structures were designed at, or below, grade and mimic the natural <br />shape of the streambed. They do not significantly decrease the cross-sectional azea of the <br />sveambed at their location. Numerous HEC-RAS models of similar structures in similar rivers <br />have shown that these structures do not create a flood hazard. <br />Similar Projects <br />Many of the conclusions reached in this report are based on past experiences at similaz <br />projects. Similaz modifications have been made at a number of boating parks including Vail, <br />Golden, Boulder, Gunnison and Salida. These existing designs verify several key claims made <br />by this report. <br />Primarily these courses verify the fact that these courses see increased use at increased <br />flow rates. Vail, Golden and Salida host major freestyle events during peak run-off season. <br />These events often attract thousands of spectators and have a significant effect on the local <br />community's economy. The courses also see vastly increased traffic at higher levels outside of <br />competition dates. This traffic is attributed to boaters and onlookers that are interested in the <br />more dynamic moves that are possible at higher flow rates. Furthermore the courses aze used at <br />low flow for lower, mid-level and local boating. These boaters often sharpen their skills at these <br />lower flows. <br />Secondly, the existing courses verify the design functionality. In all of these courses the <br />flow is diverted and controlled to create desirable recreational in-stream features. The size, <br />power and definition of the features is also observed to increase at increased flow rates. <br />Lastly, these courses verify the viability of a whitewater/boating park. Whitewater sport <br />is one of the fastest growing sports in the country and events held at similaz pazks have <br />significant effects on the local economy. The benefits of a whitewater/boating pazk include not <br />only the increased flow of boaters to the area but an increased flow of tourists and spectators. <br />These pazks provide a natural outdoor experience for the townspeople to enjoy in a picturesque <br />riverside environment. <br />Conclusions <br />_12_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.