Laserfiche WebLink
Arizona v. California (cont’d) <br />Did not apportion tributaries between the Lower Basin <br />States, with the exception of apportionment of upper Gila <br />between New Mexico and Arizona. Decree, II.C; VIII.B . <br />Recognizes the apportionment of the Lower Basin’s 7.5 <br />maf apportionment under the Colorado River Compact <br />as it was proposed in the Boulder Canyon Project Act. <br />California: 4.4 MAF annually <br />Arizona: 2.8 MAF annually <br />Nevada: .3 MAF annually