My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150331 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
C150331 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:11:00 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 8:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150331
Contractor Name
North Delta Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
40
County
Delta
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ken Nelson <br />December 20, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />canal system, and because there are only a few water users between this segment and the intake <br />above Austin, now conveyance through this segment closely matches decreed water rights of almost <br />50 efs. <br />Evaluation of the canal system is based on providing long -term management, reliable operation and <br />routine maintenance needed for efficient. uninterrupted, and the reliable conveyance and delivery of <br />irrigation water to agricultural and residential users. <br />Condition otExisting System <br />General, Operating Parameters. The NDIC provides irrigation water to approximately 183 hcadgates <br />during the growing season from April through October. Peak irrigation usage, generally occurs in <br />August and September, Irrigation flow is diverted from the Gunnison River above Austin, and is <br />conveyed through open ditches, several tunnels and buried conduit(s), <br />According to tile local Water Commissioner, Steve Tuck, the 2011 alternative diversion from <br />Tongue Creek was able to provide approxiixiately 25 to 30 cfs during the height of the irrigation <br />season. Although the full 50 cfs was not available to divert into the canal system for the use by a <br />majority of headgates, loss of crops was not an issue. Mr. Tuck also noted that 2011 was an <br />atypically high water year; with flow in Tongue Creek well above its more typical 2 to 3 cfs in <br />August and September, <br />Inverted Siphon. The inverted siphon was constructed as as part of the original irrigation systern <br />during the early 1900's. It is buried 48" diameter pipe at each end, and is approximately 1,700 feet <br />in length between concrete inlet and outlet structures. The majority of its length is reportedly <br />constructed of aged timber and concrete, and is aligned across private property in the shortest <br />distance between inlet and Outlet, locations. Details of construction beneath Highway 65 are <br />unknown. The inverted siphon is subject to at least 22 psi pressure at the lowest elevation beneath <br />Tongue Creek. It is estimated that the 50 cfs decreed water right flows at a velocity of about 4 fps, <br />which is adequate to maintain solid material (i.e., sediment or mud) in suspension. A headgate is <br />installed at Tongue Creek for seasonal draining. <br />The outlet structure is 18.5-feet deep at the pipe connection, and includes two (2) raised steps prior <br />to discharging to the open ditch. The inlet structure has a concrete Rowline and wing wall <br />approaches adjacent to the canal, and a drop strUCUR-C at the pipe connection that is 8.25-feet below <br />timber plank-s across the top. Inlet and outlet pipes are SUNnerged when water flows. Elevation <br />differential between tile upstream and downstream canal nowiines is 2.2- feet. The depth of flow in <br />the upstream canal provides the hydrau tic pressure gradient necessary to overcome headlosses <br />through the inverted siphon. <br />The NDIC has experienced as few ruptures of the inverted siphon across agricultural field(s) west of <br />Highway 65, These failures are reportedly easy to locate because of water rising from the ground <br />surface at the failed section. Thernethod of repair has generally been concrete, patches at isolated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.